Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30715650›Full record

ReviewMolecular neurobiology2019

Pluripotent Stem Cells as Models of Retina Development.

Amy Q Lu, Colin J Barnstable

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular neurobiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Amy Q LuDepartment of Neural and Behavioral Sciences, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA, 17033, USA.
Colin J BarnstableDepartment of Neural and Behavioral Sciences, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA, 17033, USA. cbarnstable@psu.edu.

Funding

Macula Vision Research Foundation no number
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability of pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) to differentiate into retinal tissue has led to many attempts to direct this process to yield specific retinal cell types. The ability to do so would greatly impact both the study of normal retina development in model systems that can be precisely controlled and the generation of a homogeneous population of cells optimized for transplantation in cell replacement therapy. Thus far, many reviews have focused on the translational potential of PSC retinal studies. Here, we focus on the former by summarizing the advances and reflecting on the current limitations to using in vitro differentiation of PSCs into retinal cells and organoids to model in vivo retinal development, with a specific emphasis on photoreceptors. We discuss the versatility of PSC retinal differentiation systems in investigating specific developmental time points that are difficult to assess with classic developmental model systems as well as the potential for efficient screening of factors involved in regulating photoreceptor differentiation. PSCs can be used in conjunction with existing model systems to contribute to the understanding of retina and photoreceptor development, which in turn can enhance the success of using stem cells in translational studies.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsCell DifferentiationCell LineageHumansPhotoreceptor Cells, VertebratePluripotent Stem CellsRetinaDevelopmentDifferentiationPhotoreceptorPluripotentRetinaStem cells

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.