Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30715619›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical systems2019

Evaluation of Central Fatigue by the Critical Flicker Fusion Threshold in Cyclists.

Vicente Javier Clemente-Suárez, Montaña Diaz-Manzano

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical systems, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Critical flicker fusion frequency: confounders and caveats.European journal of applied physiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Central and Peripheral Fatigue in Physical Exercise Explained: A Narrative Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Vicente Javier Clemente-SuárezFaculty of Sports Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Tajo street, s/n, 28670, Villaviciosa de Odón, Madrid, Spain. vctxente@yahoo.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2397-2801
Montaña Diaz-ManzanoResearch Center in Applied Combat (CESCA), Toledo, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Central fatigue related in sport stimuli was studied by Critical Flicker Fusion Threshold (CFFT) to know the influence of exercise on the central nervous system (CNS), but there is a lack of knowledge about the central or peripheral fatigue in endurance events. This study aimed to analyze changes in CFFT before and after the incremental cycle ergometer test as a means to assess the fatigue of the CNS. CFFT ascending and descending, the subjective criterion and sensory sensitivity were analysed in 8 professional male cyclists (72.1 ± 5.59 kg, 180.3 ± 6.43 cm, 17.4 ± 0.7 years) before and after a maximum incremental cycle ergometer test (start 50w increases 50w each 5 min). In this incremental test, the induced fatigue was probably more a peripheral phenomenon than one due to central nervous system fatigue, because sensory sensitivity did not significantly decrease. In conclusion, an incremental cycle ergometer test increased the cortical arousal and does not affect negatively the CNS of professional cyclists.

Indexed as

AdolescentArousalBicyclingCentral Nervous SystemExercise TestFatigueFlicker FusionHeart RateHumansMalePhysical EnduranceCentral nervous systemCortical arousalCycle ergometerFatigueFlicker fusion threshold

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.