Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30715585›Full record

SynthesisEuropean radiology2019

Diagnostic performance of [

Seung Baek Hong, Sang Hyun Choi, Kyung Won Kim, Seong Ho Park, So Yeon Kim, So Jung Lee, Seung Soo Lee, Jae Ho Byun, Moon-Gyu Lee

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. International EANM-SNMMI-ISMRM consensus recommendation for PET/MRI in oncology.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Seung Baek HongDepartment of Radiology and the Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea.
Sang Hyun ChoiDepartment of Radiology and the Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea. edwardchoi83@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6898-6617
Kyung Won KimDepartment of Radiology and the Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea.
Seong Ho ParkDepartment of Radiology and the Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea.
So Yeon KimDepartment of Radiology and the Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea.
So Jung LeeDepartment of Radiology and the Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea.
Seung Soo LeeDepartment of Radiology and the Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea.
Jae Ho ByunDepartment of Radiology and the Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea.
Moon-Gyu LeeDepartment of Radiology and the Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea.
Ulsan College · KR

Funding

Ministry of Health and Welfare HI18C2383
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo systematically determine the diagnostic accuracy of 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging ([

methodsPubMed and EMBASE databases were searched up until December 31, 2017, to identify original research studies reporting the diagnostic performance (Se and Sp) of PET/MRI for liver metastases, in comparison with PET/CT. Study quality was assessed using QUADAS-2. The summary Se and Sp of the studies were estimated using hierarchical modeling methods. To determine causes of study heterogeneity, the presence of a threshold effect was analyzed, and meta-regression analysis was performed.

resultsOf 546 articles screened, eight suitable articles were identified, with seven for per-lesion analysis, and four for per-patient analysis. The meta-analytic summary Se and Sp for per-patient-based analysis were 99.2% (95% CI, 31.4-100.0%, I

conclusionThe diagnostic accuracy of [ KEY POINTS: • [

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansLiverLiver NeoplasmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeoplasm MetastasisPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyRadiopharmaceuticalsFluorodeoxyglucose F18RadiopharmaceuticalsFluorodeoxyglucose F18LiverMagnetic resonance imagingNeoplasmsPositron emission tomography-computed tomography

Identifiers

PMID30715585
OpenAlexW2912839422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.