ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2020
Genetic association in female stress urinary incontinence based on proteomic findings: a case-control study.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Inheritance patterns of lower urinary tract symptoms in adults: a systematic review.BJU international · 2025Pooled it
- Molecular Processes in Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Systematic Review of Human and Animal Studies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisPrevious studies have indicated a hereditary component of stress urinary incontinence; however, evidence on candidate genes or single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) is scarce. We hypothesize a genetic association of female stress urinary incontinence based on significant differences of the urinary and serum proteomic pattern in the identical study population.
methodsCase-control study of 19 patients and 19 controls. We searched for known SNPs of SUI candidate genes (COL1A1, MMP1, SERPINA5, UMOD) in the database of short genetic variations and PubMed. Genomic DNA was isolated using QIAamp DNA Blood Midi Kit (Qiagen). We performed Sanger sequencing of selected exons and introns.
resultsThe rs885786 SNP of the SERPINA5 gene was identified in 15 cases and 10 controls (p = 0.09). The rs6113 SNP of the SERPINA5 gene was present in 4 controls compared to 0 cases (p = 0.105). The rs4293393, rs13333226 and rs13335818 SNPs of the UMOD gene were identified in five cases and two controls (p = 0.20), the rs1800012 SNP of the COL1A1 gene in five cases versus four controls (p = 0.24) and the homozygous rs1799750 SNP of the MMP1 gene in eight cases versus five controls (p = 0.18). The combination of the rs885786 SNP of the SERPINA5 gene and rs179970 SNP of the MMP1 gene was detected in ten cases versus five controls (p = 0.072).
conclusionsWe found nonsignificant trends toward associations of SNPs on the SERPINA5, UMOD and MMP1 gene and SUI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.