Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30715543›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia bulletin2019

A Cross-National Investigation of Hallucination-Like Experiences in 10 Countries: The E-CLECTIC Study.

Sara Siddi, Susana Ochoa, Frank Laroi, Matteo Cella, Andrea Raballo, Sandra Saldivia, Yanet Quijada, Julien Laloyaux, Nuno Barbosa Rocha, Tania M Lincoln and 10 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Sara SiddiParc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Fundació Sant Joan de Déu, Institut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Spain.
Susana OchoaParc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Fundació Sant Joan de Déu, Institut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Spain.
Frank LaroiDepartment of Biological and Medical Psychology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Matteo CellaDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Andrea RaballoDepartment of Medicine, Section of Psychiatry, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Sandra SaldiviaDepartment of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Concepcion, Concepcion, Chile.
Yanet QuijadaFacultad de Psicologia, Universidad San Sebastian, Concepcion, Chile.
Julien LaloyauxDepartment of Biological and Medical Psychology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Nuno Barbosa RochaCenter for Rehabilitation Research, School of Health, P.Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Tania M LincolnClinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology and Movement Sciences, Universitat Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Björn SchlierClinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology and Movement Sciences, Universitat Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Evangelos NtourosPsychiatric Department, 424 General Military Hospital of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Vasileios P Bozikas1st Department of Psychiatry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, General Hospital "Papageorgiou", Thessaloniki, Greece.
Lukasz GawedaII Department of Psychiatry, The Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Sergio MachadoLaboratory of Panic and Respiration, Institute of Psychiatry (IPUB), Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Antonio E NardiLaboratory of Panic and Respiration, Institute of Psychiatry (IPUB), Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Demián RodanteInstitute of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina; "Dr. Braulio A. Moyano" Neuropsychiatric Hospital, Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Smita N DeshpandeDepartment of Psychiatry, & Centre of Excellence in Mental Health, PGIMER-Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Road, New Delhi, India.
Josep Maria HaroParc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Fundació Sant Joan de Déu, Institut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Spain.
Antonio PretiDepartment of Education, Psychology, Philosophy, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hallucination-like experiences (HLEs) are typically defined as sensory perceptions in the absence of external stimuli. Multidimensional tools, able to assess different facets of HLEs, are helpful for a better characterization of hallucination proneness and to investigate the cross-national variation in the frequencies of HLEs. The current study set out to establish the validity, factor structure, and measurement invariance of the Launay-Slade Hallucinations Scale-Extended (LSHS-E), a tool to assess HLEs. A total of 4419 respondents from 10 countries were enrolled. Network analyses between the LSHS-E and the 3 dimensions of the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE) were performed to assess convergent and divergent validity of the LSHS-E. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to test its measurement invariance. The best fit was a 4-factor model, which proved invariant by country and clinical status, indicating cross-national stability of the hallucination-proneness construct. Among the different components of hallucination-proneness, auditory-visual HLEs had the strongest association with the positive dimension of the CAPE, compared with the depression and negative dimensions. Participants who reported a diagnosis of a mental disorder scored higher on the 4 LSHS-E factors. Small effect size differences by country were found in the scores of the 4 LSHS-E factors even after taking into account the role of socio-demographic and clinical variables. Due to its good psychometric properties, the LSHS-E is a strong candidate tool for large investigations of HLEs.

Indexed as

Global HealthAdolescentAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesEuropeFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHallucinationsHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsReproducibility of ResultsSouth America

Identifiers

PMID30715543
PMCPMC6357978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.