Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30715331›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2019

Demographic History of the Human Commensal Drosophila melanogaster.

J Roman Arguello, Stefan Laurent, Andrew G Clark

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Ecology and Diversity of UrbanEcology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Response of fruit fly (Physiological entomology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

J Roman ArguelloDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Switzerland.
Stefan LaurentMax Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Köln, Germany.
Andrew G ClarkDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University.

Funding

Functional /Comparative Genomic of Drosophila immunityR01AI064950 · NIAID · CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA · PI CLARK, ANDREW G, LAZZARO, BRIAN · 2005 to 2016
$3.7M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI064950
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cohabitation of Drosophila melanogaster with humans is nearly ubiquitous. Though it has been well established that this fly species originated in sub-Saharan Africa, and only recently has spread globally, many details of its swift expansion remain unclear. Elucidating the demographic history of D. melanogaster provides a unique opportunity to investigate how human movement might have impacted patterns of genetic diversity in a commensal species, as well as providing neutral null models for studies aimed at identifying genomic signatures of local adaptation. Here, we use whole-genome data from five populations (Africa, North America, Europe, Central Asia, and the South Pacific) to carry out demographic inferences, with particular attention to the inclusion of migration and admixture. We demonstrate the importance of these parameters for model fitting and show that how previous estimates of divergence times are likely to be significantly underestimated as a result of not including them. Finally, we discuss how human movement along early shipping routes might have shaped the present-day population structure of D. melanogaster.

Indexed as

Gene FlowAnimal MigrationAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterHumansModels, GeneticPhylogeographyPolymorphism, Single NucleotideTransportationadmixturedemographyDrosophilamigrationpopulation expansion

Identifiers

PMID30715331
PMCPMC6430986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.