Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30715311›Full record

ArticleGigaScience2019

Integrating genomic resources to present full gene and putative promoter capture probe sets for bread wheat.

Laura-Jayne Gardiner, Thomas Brabbs, Alina Akhunov, Katherine Jordan, Hikmet Budak, Todd Richmond, Sukhwinder Singh, Leah Catchpole, Eduard Akhunov, Anthony Hall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GigaScience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. A novel root hair mutant,Frontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  3. Sequencing 4.3 million mutations in wheat promoters to understand and modify gene expression.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. The evolving battle between yellow rust and wheat: implications for global food security.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Current and Future Pathotyping Platforms forPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Laura-Jayne GardinerEarlham Institute, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7UZ, UK.
Thomas BrabbsEarlham Institute, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7UZ, UK.
Alina AkhunovDepartment of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, 66506, USA.
Katherine JordanDepartment of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, 66506, USA.
Hikmet BudakDepartment of Plant Sciences and Plant Pathology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, 59717, USA.
Todd RichmondRoche Sequencing Solutions, 500 S Rosa Road, Madison, WI, 53719, USA.
Sukhwinder SinghCIMMYT, Calle Dr Norman E Borlaug, Ciudad Obregon, 85208, Mexico.
Leah CatchpoleEarlham Institute, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7UZ, UK.
Eduard AkhunovDepartment of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, 66506, USA.
Anthony HallEarlham Institute, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7UZ, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N005104/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N005155/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P016855/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhole-genome shotgun resequencing of wheat is expensive because of its large, repetitive genome. Moreover, sequence data can fail to map uniquely to the reference genome, making it difficult to unambiguously assign variation. Resequencing using target capture enables sequencing of large numbers of individuals at high coverage to reliably identify variants associated with important agronomic traits. Previous studies have implemented complementary DNA/exon or gene-based probe sets in which the promoter and intron sequence is largely missing alongside newly characterized genes from the recent improved reference sequences.

resultsWe present and validate 2 gold standard capture probe sets for hexaploid bread wheat, a gene and a putative promoter capture, which are designed using recently developed genome sequence and annotation resources. The captures can be combined or used independently. We demonstrate that the capture probe sets effectively enrich the high-confidence genes and putative promoter regions that were identified in the genome alongside a large proportion of the low-confidence genes and associated promoters. Finally, we demonstrate successful sample multiplexing that allows generation of adequate sequence coverage for single-nucleotide polymorphism calling while significantly reducing cost per sample for gene and putative promoter capture.

conclusionsWe show that a capture design employing an "island strategy" can enable analysis of the large gene/putative promoter space of wheat with only 2 × 160 Mbp probe sets. Furthermore, these assays extend the regions of the wheat genome that are amenable to analyses beyond its exome, providing tools for detailed characterization of these regulatory regions in large populations.

Indexed as

Genes, PlantGenome, PlantGenomicsPromoter Regions, GeneticComputational BiologyExomeGenomic LibraryHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansSequence Analysis, DNATriticumgene captureplant genomespromoter capturewheat

Identifiers

PMID30715311
PMCPMC6461119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.