ArticleGigaScience2019
Integrating genomic resources to present full gene and putative promoter capture probe sets for bread wheat.
Article in GigaScience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in gene cloning and functional genomics approaches for wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) improvement.The plant genome · 2026Review
- A novel root hair mutant,Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Sequencing 4.3 million mutations in wheat promoters to understand and modify gene expression.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- A second-generation capture panel for cost-effective sequencing of genome regulatory regions in wheat and relatives.The plant genome · 2023Article
- The evolving battle between yellow rust and wheat: implications for global food security.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2022Review
- The Use and Limitations of Exome Capture to Detect Novel Variation in the Hexaploid Wheat Genome.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Exploring the diversity of promoter and 5'UTR sequences in ancestral, historic and modern wheat.Plant biotechnology journal · 2021Article
- Current and Future Pathotyping Platforms forPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Positional-based cloning 'fail-safe' approach is overpowered by wheat chromosome structural variation.The plant genome · 2021Article
- The best of both worlds: Combining lineage-specific and universal bait sets in target-enrichment hybridization reactions.Applications in plant sciences · 2021Article
- Limited haplotype diversity underlies polygenic trait architecture across 70 years of wheat breeding.Genome biology · 2021Article
- Strategies for reducing per-sample costs in target capture sequencing for phylogenomics and population genomics in plants.Applications in plant sciences · 2020Review
- Combining a New Exome Capture Panel With an Effective varBScore Algorithm Accelerates BSA-Based Gene Cloning in Wheat.Frontiers in plant science · 2020Article
- Integrating genomic resources to present full gene and putative promoter capture probe sets for bread wheat.GigaScience · 2019Article
- Applying the latest advances in genomics and phenomics for trait discovery in polyploid wheat.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWhole-genome shotgun resequencing of wheat is expensive because of its large, repetitive genome. Moreover, sequence data can fail to map uniquely to the reference genome, making it difficult to unambiguously assign variation. Resequencing using target capture enables sequencing of large numbers of individuals at high coverage to reliably identify variants associated with important agronomic traits. Previous studies have implemented complementary DNA/exon or gene-based probe sets in which the promoter and intron sequence is largely missing alongside newly characterized genes from the recent improved reference sequences.
resultsWe present and validate 2 gold standard capture probe sets for hexaploid bread wheat, a gene and a putative promoter capture, which are designed using recently developed genome sequence and annotation resources. The captures can be combined or used independently. We demonstrate that the capture probe sets effectively enrich the high-confidence genes and putative promoter regions that were identified in the genome alongside a large proportion of the low-confidence genes and associated promoters. Finally, we demonstrate successful sample multiplexing that allows generation of adequate sequence coverage for single-nucleotide polymorphism calling while significantly reducing cost per sample for gene and putative promoter capture.
conclusionsWe show that a capture design employing an "island strategy" can enable analysis of the large gene/putative promoter space of wheat with only 2 × 160 Mbp probe sets. Furthermore, these assays extend the regions of the wheat genome that are amenable to analyses beyond its exome, providing tools for detailed characterization of these regulatory regions in large populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.