Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30715305›Full record

ArticleHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2019

Risk of cancer in children and young adults conceived by assisted reproductive technology.

Mandy Spaan, Alexandra W van den Belt-Dusebout, Marry M van den Heuvel-Eibrink, Michael Hauptmann, Cornelis B Lambalk, Curt W Burger, Flora E van Leeuwen, OMEGA-steering group

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Long-Term Effects of ART on the Health of the Offspring.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Assisted reproductive technology: Short- and long-term outcomes.Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Der Onkologe : Organ der Deutschen Krebsgesellschaft e.V · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.

Mandy SpaanDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Alexandra W van den Belt-DuseboutDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marry M van den Heuvel-EibrinkPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Lundlaan, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Michael HauptmannDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Cornelis B LambalkDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Curt W BurgerDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Erasmus University Medical Center. Wytemaweg, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Flora E van LeeuwenDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
OMEGA-steering group
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLErasmus MC · NLAdmiraal De Ruyter Ziekenhuis · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLPrincess Máxima Center · NLUniversity Medical Center · USUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

Long-term Impact of Fertility Treatment StudyR01HD088393 · NICHD · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI HERNAN, MIGUEL, HERNANDEZ-DIAZ, SONIA · 2017 to 2022
$2.9M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD088393
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionDo children conceived by ART have an increased risk of cancer? SUMMARY ANSWER: Overall, ART-conceived children do not appear to have an increased risk of cancer. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Despite the increasing use of ART, i.e. IVF or ICSI worldwide, information about possible long-term health risks for children conceived by these techniques is scarce. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A nationwide historical cohort study with prospective follow-up (median 21 years), including all live-born offspring from women treated with subfertility treatments between 1980 and 2001. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,

methodsAll offspring of a nationwide cohort of subfertile women (OMEGA study) treated in one of the 12 Dutch IVF clinics or two fertility clinics. Of 47 690 live-born children, 24 269 were ART-conceived, 13 761 naturally conceived and 9660 were conceived naturally or through fertility drugs, but not by ART. Information on the conception method of each child and potential confounders were collected through the mothers' questionnaires and medical records. Cancer incidence was ascertained through linkage with The Netherlands Cancer Registry from 1 January 1989 until 1 November 2016. Cancer risk in ART-conceived children was compared with risks in naturally conceived children from subfertile women (hazard ratios [HRs]) and with the general population (standardized incidence ratios [SIRs]). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The median follow-up was 21 years (interquartile range (IQR): 17-25) and was shorter in ART-conceived children (20 years, IQR: 17-23) compared with naturally conceived children (24 years, IQR: 20-30). In total, 231 cancers were observed. Overall cancer risk was not increased in ART-conceived children, neither compared with naturally conceived children from subfertile women (HR: 1.00, 95% CI 0.72-1.38) nor compared with the general population (SIR = 1.11, 95% CI: 0.90-1.36). From 18 years of age onwards, the HR of cancer in ART-conceived versus naturally conceived individuals was 1.25 (95% CI: 0.73-2.13). Slightly but non-significantly increased risks were observed in children conceived by ICSI or cryopreservation (HR = 1.52, 95% CI: 0.81-2.85; 1.80, 95% CI: 0.65-4.95, respectively). Risks of lymphoblastic leukemia (HR = 2.44, 95% CI: 0.81-7.37) and melanoma (HR = 1.86, 95% CI: 0.66-5.27) were non-significantly increased for ART-conceived compared with naturally conceived children. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Despite the large size and long follow-up of the cohort, the number of cancers was rather small for subgroup analyses as cancer in children and young adults is rare. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsOverall, ART-conceived children do not appear to have an increased cancer risk after a median follow-up of 21 years. This large study provides important results, enabling physicians to better inform couples considering ART about the long-term safety of ART for their children. However, larger studies with prolonged follow-up are needed to investigate cancer risk in adults and in children conceived by ICSI and/or from cryopreserved embryos. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This work was supported by The Dutch Cancer Society (NKI 2006-3631) which funded the OMEGA-women's cohort and Children Cancer Free (KIKA;147) which funded the OMEGA-offspring cohort. We declare no competing interests.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMelanomaNetherlandsPrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesReproductive Techniques, Assistedcancerfertility drugsIVFlong-termoffspring

Identifiers

PMID30715305
PMCPMC6443110
OpenAlexW2913535294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.