ArticleHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2019
Risk of cancer in children and young adults conceived by assisted reproductive technology.
Article in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.
- Epigenetic, environmental, and sex-specific programming of long-term health in Assisted Reproductive Technologies-conceived offspring†.Biology of reproduction · 2026Review
- Epitranscriptomic modifications in embryonic development: insights into natural and ART-induced mechanisms and implications.Human reproduction update · 2026Review
- Long-Term Health Outcomes of Children Born After In Vitro Fertilization (IVF): A Narrative Review.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
- Sex differences in childhood cancer risk following ART conception: a registry-based study.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Medically Assisted Reproduction and Risk of Cancer Among Offspring.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Assisted Reproductive Technologies: A New Player in the Foetal Programming of Childhood and Adult Diseases?Pediatric reports · 2024Review
- The Long-Term Outcome of Children Conceived Through Assisted Reproductive Technology.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2024Review
- Long-term health risk of offspring born from assisted reproductive technologies.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024Review
- An Assessment of Cryopreserved Semen and Testicular Tissue Collected Before and After Cancer Treatment Initiation.Cancer management and research · 2024Article
- Elevated Sperm DNA Damage in IVF-ICSI Treatments Is Not Related to Pregnancy Complications and Adverse Neonatal Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Long-Term Effects of ART on the Health of the Offspring.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Cancer risk in children, adolescents, and young adults conceived by ART in 1983-2011.Human reproduction open · 2023Article
- Assisted reproductive technology: Short- and long-term outcomes.Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2023Review
- Reproductive outcomes in women and men conceived by assisted reproductive technologies in Norway: prospective registry based study.BMJ medicine · 2023Article
- The Use of Assisted Reproductive Technology by European Childhood Cancer Survivors.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022Article
- Assisted Reproductive Technology and Risk of Childhood Cancers.JAMA network open · 2022Article
- Alteration of Genomic Imprinting after Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Long-Term Health.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Health outcomes in offspring born to survivors of childhood cancers following assisted reproductive technologies.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2021Article
- Article
- The hypomethylation of imprinted genes in IVF/ICSI placenta samples is associated with concomitant changes in histone modifications.Epigenetics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
study questionDo children conceived by ART have an increased risk of cancer? SUMMARY ANSWER: Overall, ART-conceived children do not appear to have an increased risk of cancer. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Despite the increasing use of ART, i.e. IVF or ICSI worldwide, information about possible long-term health risks for children conceived by these techniques is scarce. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A nationwide historical cohort study with prospective follow-up (median 21 years), including all live-born offspring from women treated with subfertility treatments between 1980 and 2001. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
methodsAll offspring of a nationwide cohort of subfertile women (OMEGA study) treated in one of the 12 Dutch IVF clinics or two fertility clinics. Of 47 690 live-born children, 24 269 were ART-conceived, 13 761 naturally conceived and 9660 were conceived naturally or through fertility drugs, but not by ART. Information on the conception method of each child and potential confounders were collected through the mothers' questionnaires and medical records. Cancer incidence was ascertained through linkage with The Netherlands Cancer Registry from 1 January 1989 until 1 November 2016. Cancer risk in ART-conceived children was compared with risks in naturally conceived children from subfertile women (hazard ratios [HRs]) and with the general population (standardized incidence ratios [SIRs]). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The median follow-up was 21 years (interquartile range (IQR): 17-25) and was shorter in ART-conceived children (20 years, IQR: 17-23) compared with naturally conceived children (24 years, IQR: 20-30). In total, 231 cancers were observed. Overall cancer risk was not increased in ART-conceived children, neither compared with naturally conceived children from subfertile women (HR: 1.00, 95% CI 0.72-1.38) nor compared with the general population (SIR = 1.11, 95% CI: 0.90-1.36). From 18 years of age onwards, the HR of cancer in ART-conceived versus naturally conceived individuals was 1.25 (95% CI: 0.73-2.13). Slightly but non-significantly increased risks were observed in children conceived by ICSI or cryopreservation (HR = 1.52, 95% CI: 0.81-2.85; 1.80, 95% CI: 0.65-4.95, respectively). Risks of lymphoblastic leukemia (HR = 2.44, 95% CI: 0.81-7.37) and melanoma (HR = 1.86, 95% CI: 0.66-5.27) were non-significantly increased for ART-conceived compared with naturally conceived children. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Despite the large size and long follow-up of the cohort, the number of cancers was rather small for subgroup analyses as cancer in children and young adults is rare. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
findingsOverall, ART-conceived children do not appear to have an increased cancer risk after a median follow-up of 21 years. This large study provides important results, enabling physicians to better inform couples considering ART about the long-term safety of ART for their children. However, larger studies with prolonged follow-up are needed to investigate cancer risk in adults and in children conceived by ICSI and/or from cryopreserved embryos. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This work was supported by The Dutch Cancer Society (NKI 2006-3631) which funded the OMEGA-women's cohort and Children Cancer Free (KIKA;147) which funded the OMEGA-offspring cohort. We declare no competing interests.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.