Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30715238›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2019

Objective Morphological Classification of Neocortical Pyramidal Cells.

Lida Kanari, Srikanth Ramaswamy, Ying Shi, Sebastien Morand, Julie Meystre, Rodrigo Perin, Marwan Abdellah, Yun Wang, Kathryn Hess, Henry Markram

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Topological Neuroscience: Linking Circuits to Function.Annual review of neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. The fiber of persistent homology for trees.Journal of applied and computational topology · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lida KanariBlue Brain Project, Brain and Mind Institute, EPFL, Campus Biotech: CH 1202, Geneva, Switzerland.
Srikanth RamaswamyBlue Brain Project, Brain and Mind Institute, EPFL, Campus Biotech: CH 1202, Geneva, Switzerland.
Ying ShiBlue Brain Project, Brain and Mind Institute, EPFL, Campus Biotech: CH 1202, Geneva, Switzerland.
Sebastien MorandLaboratory for Topology and Neuroscience, Brain Mind Institute, EPFL, CH 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Julie MeystreLaboratory of Neural Microcircuitry, Brain Mind Institute, EPFL, CH 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Rodrigo PerinLaboratory of Neural Microcircuitry, Brain Mind Institute, EPFL, CH 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Marwan AbdellahBlue Brain Project, Brain and Mind Institute, EPFL, Campus Biotech: CH 1202, Geneva, Switzerland.
Yun WangSchool of Optometry and Ophthalmology, Wenzhou Medical College, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, PR China.
Kathryn HessLaboratory for Topology and Neuroscience, Brain Mind Institute, EPFL, CH 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Henry MarkramBlue Brain Project, Brain and Mind Institute, EPFL, Campus Biotech: CH 1202, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A consensus on the number of morphologically different types of pyramidal cells (PCs) in the neocortex has not yet been reached, despite over a century of anatomical studies, due to the lack of agreement on the subjective classifications of neuron types, which is based on expert analyses of neuronal morphologies. Even for neurons that are visually distinguishable, there is no common ground to consistently define morphological types. The objective classification of PCs can be achieved with methods from algebraic topology, and the dendritic arborization is sufficient for the reliable identification of distinct types of cortical PCs. Therefore, we objectively identify 17 types of PCs in the rat somatosensory cortex. In addition, we provide a solution to the challenging problem of whether 2 similar neurons belong to different types or to a continuum of the same type. Our topological classification does not require expert input, is stable, and helps settle the long-standing debate on whether cell-types are discrete or continuous morphological variations of each other.

Indexed as

AnimalsImaging, Three-DimensionalLysineNeocortexPattern Recognition, AutomatedPyramidal CellsRatsSomatosensory CortexSupervised Machine LearningbiocytinLysineneuronal classificationneuronal morphologypyramidal cellsrat somatosensory cortextopological data analysis

Identifiers

PMID30715238
PMCPMC6418396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.