Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30715230›Full record

ArticleDiseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus2019

Management of eosinophilic esophagitis is often discordant with guidelines and not patient-centered: results of a survey of gastroenterologists.

Joy W Chang, Sameer D Saini, Jessica L Mellinger, Joan W Chen, Brian J Zikmund-Fisher, Joel H Rubenstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Cellie Coping Kit for children with Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary outcomes.Journal of child health care : for professionals working with children in the hospital and community · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Development of a Practical Guide to Implement and Monitor Diet Therapy for Eosinophilic Esophagitis.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. What patients with eosinophilic esophagitis may not share with their providers: a qualitative assessment of online health communities.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joy W ChangDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Sameer D SainiDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Jessica L MellingerDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Joan W ChenDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Brian J Zikmund-FisherDivision of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Joel H RubensteinDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Published guidelines for the management of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) recommend an initial trial of proton pump inhibitors (PPI), histologic assessment for response to therapy, and tailoring treatments to patient needs and provider resources. Effectiveness studies directly comparing therapies are lacking, leaving a situation ripe for shared decision making. We aimed to assess gastroenterologists' adherence to guidelines and how they respond to EoE patients' preferences regarding management. We administered a web-based survey to practicing US gastroenterologists, assessing knowledge, and practice patterns in the management of EoE, including comfort with alternative treatments to steroids. Ninety-two providers responded, including 55% in private practice. Nearly half (47%) reported spending ≤10 minutes on initial education and counseling and 48% recommended PPI monotherapy prior to other strategies. Of those who did not start with PPI monotherapy, 55% chose topical steroids ± PPI and 26% dietary elimination ± PPI. Despite this, 90% felt comfortable allowing a patient to start dietary elimination instead of steroids, but less comfortable with dilation alone (39%) or no treatment (30%). Upon symptomatic resolution, 72% of academic providers recommended endoscopy with biopsies to demonstrate histologic response to treatment, compared to 27% in private practice. There are substantial variations in adherence to guidelines regarding PPI use and assessing response to therapy. Gastroenterologists prefer topical steroids over other treatment modalities and most spend little time educating and counseling, which may limit informed decision making. Strategies aimed at decreasing these variations in management and promoting shared decision making in EoE are needed.

Indexed as

BiopsyDecision Making, SharedDilatationDirective CounselingEosinophilic EsophagitisEsophageal MucosaFemaleGastroenterologyGuideline AdherenceHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMalePatient-Centered CarePatient Education as TopicPatient PreferencePractice Guidelines as TopicProton Pump InhibitorsSteroidsdecisionsdisease managementguidelinespractice patternspreferenceproviders

Identifiers

PMID30715230
PMCPMC6561423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.