ReviewAesthetic surgery journal2019
The Inflammatory Effects of Breast Implant Particulate Shedding: Comparison With Orthopedic Implants.
Review in Aesthetic surgery journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Comparative Evaluation of Tissue and Systemic Responses to Electrospun Biodegradable Polymer and Polypropylene Implants Using hs-CRP and Immunohistochemical Markers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Microbial Contamination-Mediated Inflammation Is a Major Contributor of Breast Implant Complications: Prospective Analysis of 631 Samples.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Pro-Inflammatory Response to Macrotextured Silicone Implant Wear Debris.Tribology letters · 2025Article
- Silicone breast implant-associated pathologies and T cell-mediated responses.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2025Review
- Unraveling the Immune Web: Advances in SMI Capsular Fibrosis from Molecular Insights to Preclinical Breakthroughs.Biomolecules · 2024Review
- Breast Implants: Low Rate of Annual Check-Ups Results in Delayed Presentation of Ruptured Implants.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Breast Implant Silicones and B Cell-Mediated Immune Responses: A Systematic Review of Literature.JPRAS open · 2024Article
- An Update on Implant-Associated Malignancies and Their Biocompatibility.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Vulvar migration of injected polyacrylamide hydrogel following breast augmentation: a case report and literature review.BMC women's health · 2024Review
- UHMWPE suture induced pseudotumor following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: A case report.Shoulder & elbow · 2023Article
- Implant-based breast surgery and capsular formation: when, how and why?-a narrative review.Annals of translational medicine · 2023Review
- Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part J, Journal of engineering tribology · 2023Article
- Silicone Implant Surface Roughness, Friction, and Wear.Surface topography : metrology and properties · 2023Article
- Is It All about Surface Topography? An Intra-Individual Clinical Outcome Analysis of Two Different Implant Surfaces in Breast Reconstruction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Quantitative Proteomic Characterization of Foreign Body Response towards Silicone Breast Implants Identifies Chronological Disease-Relevant Biomarker Dynamics.Biomolecules · 2023Article
- The evaluation of the delayed swollen breast in patients with a history of breast implants.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- 2022 Practice Recommendation Updates From the World Consensus Conference on BIA-ALCL.Aesthetic surgery journal · 2022Review
- Review
- High-Throughput Biofilm Assay to Investigate Bacterial Interactions with Surface Topographies.ACS applied bio materials · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Currently, there is a dearth of information regarding the degree of particle shedding from breast implants (BIs) and what are the general biological consequences of BI debris. Thus, it is unclear to what degree BI debris compromises the long-term biological performance of BIs. For orthopedic implants, it is well established that the severity of biological reactivity to implant debris governs long-term clinical performance. Orthopedic implant particulate debris is generally in the range of 0.01 to 100 μm in diameter. Implant debris-induced bioreactivity/inflammation is mostly a peri-implant phenomenon caused by local innate immune cells (eg, macrophages) that produce proinflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin-1β, interleukin-6, and prostaglandin 2 (PGE2). In orthopedics, there have been few systemic concerns associated with polymeric implant debris (like silicone) other than documented dissemination to remote organs (eg, liver, spleen, etc.) with no known associated pathogenicity. This is not true of metal implant debris where normal (well-functioning) implants can induce systemic reactions such as delayed type hypersensitivity. Diagnostic analysis of orthopedic tissues has focused on innate (macrophage mediated) and adaptive (lymphocyte-mediated hypersensitivity) immune responses. Orthopedic implant debris-associated lymphocyte cancers have not been reported in over 40 years of orthopedic literature. Adaptive immune responses such as hypersensitivity reactions to orthopedic implant debris have been dominated by certain implant types that produce specific kinds of debris (eg, metal-on-metal total joint prostheses). Orthopedic hypersensitivity responses and atypical BI bioreactivity such as BI-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma share crossover markers for diagnosis. Differentiating normal innate immune reactivity to particles from anaplastic large cell lymphoma reactions from delayed type hypersensitivity reactions to BI-associated implant debris remains unclear but vital to patients and surgeons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.