Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30715176›Full record

ReviewAesthetic surgery journal2019

The Inflammatory Effects of Breast Implant Particulate Shedding: Comparison With Orthopedic Implants.

Nadim James Hallab, Lauryn Samelko, Dennis Hammond

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Aesthetic surgery journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Silicone breast implant-associated pathologies and T cell-mediated responses.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. An Update on Implant-Associated Malignancies and Their Biocompatibility.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part J, Journal of engineering tribology · 2023
    Article
  14. Silicone Implant Surface Roughness, Friction, and Wear.Surface topography : metrology and properties · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nadim James HallabDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
Lauryn SamelkoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
Dennis Hammond

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, there is a dearth of information regarding the degree of particle shedding from breast implants (BIs) and what are the general biological consequences of BI debris. Thus, it is unclear to what degree BI debris compromises the long-term biological performance of BIs. For orthopedic implants, it is well established that the severity of biological reactivity to implant debris governs long-term clinical performance. Orthopedic implant particulate debris is generally in the range of 0.01 to 100 μm in diameter. Implant debris-induced bioreactivity/inflammation is mostly a peri-implant phenomenon caused by local innate immune cells (eg, macrophages) that produce proinflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin-1β, interleukin-6, and prostaglandin 2 (PGE2). In orthopedics, there have been few systemic concerns associated with polymeric implant debris (like silicone) other than documented dissemination to remote organs (eg, liver, spleen, etc.) with no known associated pathogenicity. This is not true of metal implant debris where normal (well-functioning) implants can induce systemic reactions such as delayed type hypersensitivity. Diagnostic analysis of orthopedic tissues has focused on innate (macrophage mediated) and adaptive (lymphocyte-mediated hypersensitivity) immune responses. Orthopedic implant debris-associated lymphocyte cancers have not been reported in over 40 years of orthopedic literature. Adaptive immune responses such as hypersensitivity reactions to orthopedic implant debris have been dominated by certain implant types that produce specific kinds of debris (eg, metal-on-metal total joint prostheses). Orthopedic hypersensitivity responses and atypical BI bioreactivity such as BI-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma share crossover markers for diagnosis. Differentiating normal innate immune reactivity to particles from anaplastic large cell lymphoma reactions from delayed type hypersensitivity reactions to BI-associated implant debris remains unclear but vital to patients and surgeons.

Indexed as

Breast ImplantsCytokinesHumansImmunity, InnateInflammationLymphoma, Large-Cell, AnaplasticOrthopedic ProceduresProstheses and ImplantsProsthesis DesignProsthesis FailureCytokines

Identifiers

PMID30715176
PMCPMC6355107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.