ArticleCarcinogenesis2019
Comparing the epidemiology, clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of acute myeloid leukemia with and without acute promyelocytic leukemia.
Article in Carcinogenesis, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Adult leukemia in Florida 2010-2019: diverse, aging population as an indicator for the United States.Blood neoplasia · 2025Trial
- Nationwide analysis of acute promyelocytic leukemia: incidence and patient outcomes in Germany.Haematologica · 2026Article
- Article
- Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia in the Real World: Understanding Outcome Differences and How We Can Improve Them.Cancers · 2024Review
- Choosing the Right Cell Line for Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Phase I study of alvocidib plus cytarabine/mitoxantrone or cytarabine/daunorubicin for acute myeloid leukemia in Japan.Cancer science · 2022Article
- Article
- Second Primary Malignancy after Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia: A Population-Based Study.Cancers · 2020Article
- ProfilingFrontiers in pediatrics · 2020Article
- LncRNAOncoTargets and therapy · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is a particularly aggressive subtype of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), with high rates of early death. It is important to examine how epidemiological characteristics, clinical and treatment factors, cytogenetic and genetic data affect survival and differ between APL and non-APL AML patients. We analyzed population data from the New York State Cancer Registry to characterize AML including APL incidence rates by demographics. APL incidence rates were higher among Hispanics than non-Hispanics [incidence rate ratio = 1.22; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.02-1.43]; and among foreign-born than USA-born persons. APL incidence rates increased more rapidly through 1995-2014 than non-APL AML; and its frequency increased faster among foreign-born persons. In a hospital cohort of 390 AML patients, the risk of death was significantly higher among APL patients with FLT3-internal tandem duplications than those without [hazard ratio (HR) = 11.74; 95% CI = 1.03-134.5]; and among APL patients with secondary versus de novo disease (HR = 17.32; 95% CI = 1.56-192.1). Among non-APL AML patients, risk of death was significantly associated with prior chemotherapy with antitubulin agents after adjusting for age, gender and ethnicity (adjusted HR = 3.30; 95% CI = 1.49-7.32); and separately with older age, unfavorable cytogenetics and complex karyotype. This study highlights FLT3-internal tandem duplications as a prognostic factor in APL and proposes consideration of prior antitubulin therapy as a prognostic factor in non-APL AML.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.