Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30714852›Full record

ArticleRadiation research2019

Chromosome Translocations, Inversions and Telomere Length for Retrospective Biodosimetry on Exposed U.S. Atomic Veterans.

Miles J McKenna, Erin Robinson, Lynn Taylor, Christopher Tompkins, Michael N Cornforth, Steven L Simon, Susan M Bailey

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cytogenetic Damage Induced by Radioiodine Therapy: A Follow-Up Case Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  6. The NIAID/RNCP Biodosimetry Program: An Overview.Cytogenetic and genome research · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Miles J McKennaa Cell and Molecular Biology Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado.
Erin Robinsonc KromaTiD, Inc., Fort Collins, Colorado.
Lynn Taylorb Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado.
Christopher Tompkinsc KromaTiD, Inc., Fort Collins, Colorado.
Michael N Cornfortha Cell and Molecular Biology Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado.
Steven L Simone Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Susan M Baileya Cell and Molecular Biology Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado.
KromaTiD (United States) · USColorado State University · USNational Institutes of Health · USThe University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · US

Funding

NCI NIH HHS Y03 CO005117NIAID NIH HHS Y02 AI005077
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has now been over 60 years since U.S. nuclear testing was conducted in the Pacific islands and Nevada, exposing military personnel to varying levels of ionizing radiation. Actual doses are not well-established, as film badges in the 1950s had many limitations. We sought a means of independently assessing dose for comparison with historical film badge records and dose reconstruction conducted in parallel. For the purpose of quantitative retrospective biodosimetry, peripheral blood samples from 12 exposed veterans and 12 age-matched (>80 years) veteran controls were collected and evaluated for radiation-induced chromosome damage utilizing directional genomic hybridization (dGH), a cytogenomics-based methodology that facilitates simultaneous detection of translocations and inversions. Standard calibration curves were constructed from six male volunteers in their mid-20s to reflect the age range of the veterans at time of exposure. Doses were estimated for each veteran using translocation and inversion rates independently; however, combining them by a weighted-average generally improved the accuracy of dose estimations. Various confounding factors were also evaluated for potential effects on chromosome aberration frequencies. Perhaps not surprisingly, smoking and age-associated increases in background frequencies of inversions were observed. Telomere length was also measured, and inverse relationships with both age and combined weighted dose estimates were observed. Interestingly, smokers in the non-exposed control veteran cohort displayed similar telomere lengths as those in the never-smoker exposed veteran group, suggesting that chronic smoking had as much effect on telomere length as a single exposure to radioactive fallout. Taken together, we find that our approach of combined chromosome aberration-based retrospective biodosimetry provided reliable dose estimation capability, particularly on a group average basis, for exposures above statistical detection limits.

Indexed as

Nuclear WeaponsVeteransAdultAged, 80 and overCalibrationChromosome InversionHumansMaleOccupational ExposureRadiometryRetrospective StudiesTelomereTranslocation, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID30714852
PMCPMC6492561
OpenAlexW2912790334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.