Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30714780›Full record

ArticleEmotion (Washington, D.C.)2020

Mind wandering and stress: When you don't like the present moment.

Alexandra D Crosswell, Michael Coccia, Elissa S Epel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Combined effects of cumulative stress and daily stressors on daily health.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Mind wandering in reading: An embodied approach.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Effects of Chronic Burden Across Multiple Domains and Experiences of Daily Stressors on Negative Affect.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alexandra D CrosswellCenter for Health and Community.ORCID 0000-0002-1632-2931
Michael CocciaCenter for Health and Community.
Elissa S EpelCenter for Health and Community.ORCID 0000-0002-9334-4720

Funding

Stress, diet quality, and biological aging across the lifespanR24AG048024 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI EPEL, ELISSA S., MENDES, WENDY BERRY · 2014 to 2025
$6.2M
Psychology & Medicine: Translational Research on Stress, Behavior and DiseaseT32MH019391 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ADLER, NANCY E, EPEL, ELISSA S. · 1991 to 2022
$4.4M
Chronic and Acute Psychosocial Stress and Impaired Cell AgingR01AG030424 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI EPEL, ELISSA S. · 2010 to 2014
$3.5M
Stress resilience and aging in Alzheimers disease and dementia caregiversK01AG057859 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI CROSSWELL, ALEXANDRA DUPONT · 2018 to 2022
$652k
John and Marcia Goldman FoundationNational Institutes of Health; National Institute on AgingNIA NIH HHS K01 AG057859NIA NIH HHS R01 AG030424NIA NIH HHS R24 AG048024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Buddhist philosophy and existing empirical evidence suggest that being engaged in-and accepting-the present moment is associated with greater well-being. However, engaging with the present moment experience and ignoring unwanted thoughts is difficult given the nature of our minds and the competing demands for our attention. This may be especially true when experiencing psychological stress, during which acceptance of current experience may be particularly difficult. This study examines inter- and intraindividual variability in how psychological stress influences daily mind states, and how mind states are related to affect. For 21 days, women (n = 183; half chronically stressed, half low-stress controls) reported levels of mind wandering, engagement with and rejection of their current experience, positive and negative affect, and quality of connection to their partner. Women under chronic stress reported more evening mind wandering, less engagement, and more rejection of the moment, compared to low stress controls. These mind states were in turn associated with more negative evening mood. Daily contextual factors, specifically, having a stressful event (objectively coded) and quality of connection with spouse that day (a known stress buffer), influenced evening mind states. Results provide evidence that chronic and daily psychological stress interfere with daily presence while positive social connection enhances presence in the moment. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

AdultAffectFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedStress, PsychologicalYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30714780
PMCPMC6679812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.