Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30714378›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2019

Unbiased Atomistic Insight into the Mechanisms and Solvent Role for Globular Protein Dimer Dissociation.

Z F Brotzakis, P G Bolhuis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Z F BrotzakisVan't Hoff Institute for Molecular Sciences , Universiteit van Amsterdam , Science Park 904 , 1090 GD Amsterdam , The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7024-1430
P G BolhuisVan't Hoff Institute for Molecular Sciences , Universiteit van Amsterdam , Science Park 904 , 1090 GD Amsterdam , The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3698-9258

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Association and dissociation of proteins are fundamental processes in nature. Although simple to understand conceptually, the details of the underlying mechanisms and role of the solvent are poorly understood. Here, we investigate the dissociation of the hydrophilic β-lactoglobulin dimer by employing transition path sampling. Analysis of the sampled path ensembles reveals a variety of mechanisms: (1) a direct aligned dissociation (2) a hopping and rebinding transition followed by unbinding, and (3) a sliding transition before unbinding. Reaction coordinate and transition-state analysis predicts that, besides native contact and neighboring salt-bridge interactions, solvent degrees of freedom play an important role in the dissociation process. Bridging waters, hydrogen-bonded to both proteins, support contacts in the native state and nearby lying transition-state regions, whereas they exhibit faster dynamics in further lying transition-state regions, rendering the proteins more mobile and assisting in rebinding. Analysis of the structure and dynamics of the solvent molecules reveals that the dry native interface induces enhanced populations of both disordered hydration water near hydrophilic residues and tetrahedrally ordered hydration water nearby hydrophobic residues. Although not exhaustive, our sampling of rare unbiased reactive molecular dynamics trajectories enhances the understanding of protein dissociation via complex pathways including (multiple) rebinding events.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsHydrogen BondingHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsLactoglobulinsMolecular Dynamics SimulationProtein BindingProtein MultimerizationProtein Structure, QuaternarySolventsWaterLactoglobulinsSolventsWater

Identifiers

PMID30714378
PMCPMC6581425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.