ArticleInternational dental journal2019
Periodontal screening during an oral public health promotion campaign: a study among health consumers.
Article in International dental journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- General Dental Practitioners' and Dental Hygienists' Perspectives on the Dutch Guideline for Periodontal Screening, Diagnostics, and Treatment in General Practice.International journal of dental hygiene · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
introductionDiseases such as periodontal disease and halitosis have a negative impact on both the economy and the quality of life worldwide; thus, poor oral health has become a public health concern. The aim of this study was to characterise the oral health status of visitors to a public health consumer's exhibition using demographic and social characteristics and consumers' periodontal health condition.
methodsDuring this cross-sectional study in 2010-2014, 1,223 visitors completed a questionnaire. The periodontal condition of 760 participants was screened by dental hygienists of the Dutch Dental Hygienists' Association using the Dutch Periodontal Screening Index (DPSI).
resultsA total of 1,029 visitors with a mean age of 45.38 years were included. The numerically lowest mean level of DPSI (2.59) occurred in 2014, whereas the numerically highest mean of DPSI (3.67) occurred in 2012. Each year, the DPSI scores were not normally distributed and were significantly higher for men than for women. Significant differences between DPSI score and age and between DPSI score and education were observed.
conclusionDifferences in DSPI score related to age and education were found. This means that specific groups of people with poorer oral health, mostly elderly or less-educated people, may need adjusted target interventions to prevent oral diseases. Insights into the benefits of public awareness and the development of optimally targeted interventions are needed for oral health promotion and the prevention of oral diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.