Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30713811›Full record

ArticleClinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science2019

The Future of Intervention Science: Process-Based Therapy.

Stefan G Hofmann, Steven C Hayes

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07588516 (Comprehensive Behavioral Community Dynamics), which is not on this map. Cited by 231 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
231citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07588516 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Comprehensive Behavioral Community Dynamics (DICO): A Prospective Longitudinal Study of Multilevel Community Processes in Therapeutic Communities for Substance Use Treatment in Mexico

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorUnder The Tree Therapeutic CommunityRan2026 to 2026Enrolled60ConditionsSubstance Use Disorder (SUD), Treatment AdherenceArmsEcological Momentary Assessment (EMA)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

231 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Effects of attention bias modification for anxiety: Neurophysiological indices and moderation by symptom severity.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2023
    Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

171 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Stefan G HofmannBoston University.
Steven C HayesUniversity of Nevada, Reno.

Funding

Connectomes Related to Anxiety and Depression in AdolescentsU01MH108168 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI GABRIELI, JOHN, WHITFIELD-GABRIELI, SUSAN · 2015 to 2019
$4.6M
Toward Outcome Measurement of Anxiety in Youth with Autism Spectrum DisordersR01MH099021 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SCAHILL, LAWRENCE D. · 2012 to 2015
$2.7M
1/2-Yoga For Generalized Anxiety DisorderR01AT007257 · NCCIH · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI HOFMANN, STEFAN G. · 2013 to 2017
$2.0M
2/3-Dose Timing of D-cycloserine to Augment CBT for Social Anxiety DisorderR34MH099311 · NIMH · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI HOFMANN, STEFAN G. · 2014 to 2016
$737k
NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT007257NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH099021NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH099311NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH108168
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical science seems to have reached a tipping point. It appears that a new paradigm is beginning to emerge that is questioning the validity and utility of the medical illness model, which assumes that latent disease entities are targeted with specific therapy protocols. A new generation of evidence-based care has begun to move toward process-based therapies to target core mediators and moderators based on testable theories. This could represent a paradigm shift in clinical science with far-reaching implications. Clinical science might see a decline of named therapies defined by set technologies, a decline of broad schools, a rise of testable models, a rise of mediation and moderation studies, the emergence of new forms of diagnosis based on functional analysis, a move from nomothetic to idiographic approaches, and a move toward processes that specify modifiable elements. These changes could integrate or bridge different treatment orientations, settings, and even cultures.

Identifiers

PMID30713811
PMCPMC6350520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.