Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30713485›Full record

ArticleCEUR workshop proceedings2018

Automated Pain Detection in Facial Videos of Children using Human-Assisted Transfer Learning.

Xiaojing Xu, Kenneth D Craig, Damaris Diaz, Matthew S Goodwin, Murat Akcakaya, Büşra Tuğçe Susam, Jeannie S Huang, Virginia R de Sa

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CEUR workshop proceedings, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
23.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Potential applications of artificial intelligence in pain management: a scoping review.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Xiaojing XuDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA, xix068@ucsd.edu.
Kenneth D CraigDepartment of Psychology, University of British Columbia Vancouver, BC, Canada, kcraig@psych.ubc.ca.
Damaris DiazRady Childrens Hospital and Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Diego, CA, USA, dad003@ucsd.edu,jshuang@ucsd.edu.
Matthew S GoodwinDepartment of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA, m.goodwin@northeastern.edu.
Murat AkcakayaDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, akcakaya@pitt.edu,tugcebusraiu@gmail.com.
Büşra Tuğçe SusamDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, akcakaya@pitt.edu,tugcebusraiu@gmail.com.
Jeannie S HuangRady Childrens Hospital and Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Diego, CA, USA, dad003@ucsd.edu,jshuang@ucsd.edu.
Virginia R de SaDepartment of Cognitive Science, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA, desa@ucsd.edu.
University of California San Diego · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USNortheastern University · USUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

Development of a new technology for assessing pediatric pain (NTAP)R01NR013500 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI CRAIG, KENNETH DENTON, DE SA, VIRGINIA · 2012 to 2016
$2.6M
NINR NIH HHS R01 NR013500
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurately determining pain levels in children is difficult, even for trained professionals and parents. Facial activity provides sensitive and specific information about pain, and computer vision algorithms have been developed to automatically detect Facial Action Units (AUs) defined by the Facial Action Coding System (FACS). Our prior work utilized information from computer vision, i.e., automatically detected facial AUs, to develop classifiers to distinguish between pain and no-pain conditions. However, application of pain/no-pain classifiers based on automated AU codings across different environmental domains results in diminished performance. In contrast, classifiers based on manually coded AUs demonstrate reduced environmentally-based variability in performance. In this paper, we train a machine learning model to recognize pain using AUs coded by a computer vision system embedded in a software package called iMotions. We also study the relationship between iMotions (automatically) and human (manually) coded AUs. We find that AUs coded automatically are different from those coded by a human trained in the FACS system, and that the human coder is less sensitive to environmental changes. To improve classification performance in the current work, we applied transfer learning by training another machine learning model to map automated AU codings to a subspace of manual AU codings to enable more robust pain recognition performance when only automatically coded AUs are available for the test data. With this transfer learning method, we improved the Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) on independent data from new participants in our target domain from 0.67 to 0.72.

Indexed as

automated pain detectionfacial action unitsFACStransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID30713485
PMCPMC6352979
OpenAlexW2888797767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.