Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30713437›Full record

ReviewZooKeys2019

Myriapoda of Canada.

David W Langor, Jeremy R deWaard, Bruce A Snyder

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in ZooKeys, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David W LangorNatural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, 5320-122 St. NW, Edmonton, Alberta, T6H 3S5, Canada Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service Edmonton Canada.
Jeremy R deWaardCentre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada University of Guelph Guelph Canada.
Bruce A SnyderDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Georgia College and State University, 320 N. Wayne St., Milledgeville, Georgia, 31061, USA Georgia College and State University Milledgeville United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The currently documented fauna of described species of myriapods in Canada includes 54 Chilopoda, 66 Diplopoda, 23 Pauropoda, and two Symphyla, representing increases of 24, 23, 23, and one species, respectively, since 1979. Of the 145 myriapod species currently documented, 40 species are not native to Canada. The myriapods have not been well documented with DNA barcodes and no barcodes are available for Pauropoda. It is conservatively estimated that at least 93 additional myriapods species will be discovered in Canada: Chilopoda (40), Diplopoda (29), Pauropoda (17), and Symphyla (seven). In general, there is a serious dearth of knowledge about myriapods in Canada, and systematics research and surveys continue to be needed to help document the diversity and distribution of these groups in the country.

Indexed as

biodiversity assessmentBiota of CanadacentipedesChilopodaDiplopodamillipedesPauropodaSymphyla

Identifiers

PMID30713437
PMCPMC6355731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.