Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30713431›Full record

ReviewZooKeys2019

The diversity of terrestrial arthropods in Canada.

David W Langor

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in ZooKeys, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
13.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Myriapoda of Canada.ZooKeys · 2019
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Collembola of Canada.ZooKeys · 2019
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Odonata of Canada.ZooKeys · 2019
    Review
  10. Acari of Canada.ZooKeys · 2019
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Plecoptera of Canada.ZooKeys · 2019
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Hemiptera of Canada.ZooKeys · 2019
    Review
  17. Araneae of Canada.ZooKeys · 2019
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Coleoptera of Canada.ZooKeys · 2019
    Review
  20. Hymenoptera of Canada.ZooKeys · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

David W LangorNatural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, 5320 - 122 St. NW, Edmonton, Alberta, T6H 3S5, Canada Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service Edmonton Canada.
Canadian Forest Service · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Based on data presented in 29 papers published in the

Indexed as

Arachnidabiodiversity assessmentBiota of CanadachecklistsEntognathaHexapodaInsectaMyriapodasurveystaxonomyZygentoma

Identifiers

PMID30713431
PMCPMC6355749
OpenAlexW2913807100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.