ArticleActa Cardiologica Sinica2019
The Relationship between Blood Viscosity and Isolated Coronary Artery Ectasia.
Article in Acta Cardiologica Sinica, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unravelling the Link between Inflammatory Biomarkers and Coronary Artery Ectasia Severity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cardiology · 2026Pooled it
- The association between whole blood viscosity and CHA2DS2-VASc/CHA2DS2-VA scores in patients with atrial fibrillation.Future science OA · 2025Article
- Neutrophil-Percentage-to-Albumin Ratio as a Predictor of Coronary Artery Ectasia: A Comparative Analysis with Inflammatory Biomarkers.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The correlation of whole blood viscosity and outcome in mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke.Frontiers in stroke · 2025Article
- Inflammatory Biomarkers in Coronary Artery Ectasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Association of whole blood viscosity with thrombus presence in patients undergoing transoesophageal echocardiography.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2022Article
- Curative Effect of Yangxin Dingji Capsule Combined With Mexiletine Hydrochloride on Postoperative Arrhythmia and Its Influences on the Vascular Endothelial Function in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions.Emergency medicine international · 2022Article
- Relationship between Serum Salusin Beta Levels and Coronary Artery Ectasia.Acta Cardiologica Sinica · 2021Article
- Impact of Apelin-13 on the Development of Coronary Artery Ectasia.Acta Cardiologica Sinica · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIt is unclear whether isolated coronary artery ectasia (iCAE) is associated with whole blood viscosity (WBV). In the present study, we investigated WBV in coronary artery ectasia (CAE) patients.
methodsSeventy-eight patients with iCAE and 83 controls with normal coronary arteries were selected from 12290 patients who underwent coronary angiography between January 2014 and December 2017. WBV was calculated with a validated equation from hematocrit and total plasma protein levels for a low (LSR) and high (HSR) shear rate.
resultsBaseline demographic characteristics and medical history of the groups were similar. The mean level of C-reactive protein (2.1 ± 0.53 vs. 1.93 ± 0.44; p = 0.042) and total protein (7.2 ± 0.3 vs. 7.0 ± 0.6; p = 0.009) were significantly higher in the iCAE group than in the control subjects. Both HSR (4.57 ± 0.6 vs. 3.9 ± 0.7; p < 0.001) and LSR (33.5 ± 9.6 vs. 25.1 ± 9.2; p < 0.001) levels were significantly higher in the iCAE group than in the control group. In ROC analysis, a cut-off value of 4.19 WBV for HSR had an 80.8% sensitivity and 72.3% specificity [area under the curve (AUC): 0.779, 95% CI 70.6-85.1; p < 0.001] and a cut-off value of 27.5 WBV for LSR had an 80.1% sensitivity and 72.3% specificity for predicting iCAE (AUC: 0.788, 95% CI 71.4-86.2; p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, both LSR (p < 0.001, OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.05-1.15) and HSR (p < 0.001, OR 4.60, 95% CI 2.33-9.09) were independent predictors for the presence of iCAE.
conclusionsIn the present study, we determined that in WBV, both HSR and LSR were significantly higher in the iCAE group than in the control subjects, and that this may be a possible cause of iCAE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.