ArticleClinical colorectal cancer2019
Trends in Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Survival in Iowa SEER Data: The Timing of It All.
Article in Clinical colorectal cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A systematic review of methods to estimate colorectal cancer incidence using population-based cancer registries.BMC medical research methodology · 2022Pooled it
- Statistical methods for measuring trends in colorectal cancer incidence in registries: A systematic review.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Pooled it
- A systematic review of Bayesian spatial-temporal models on cancer incidence and mortality.International journal of public health · 2020Pooled it
- Differences in the epidemiology and survival of patients with colorectal cancer between China and the United States: a large cross-sectional study.Updates in surgery · 2025Article
- Spatial-temporal Bayesian accelerated failure time models for survival endpoints with applications to prostate cancer registry data.BMC medical research methodology · 2024Article
- Colorectal cancer spatial pattern in the northeast region of São Paulo, Brazil.Global epidemiology · 2023Article
- Article
- Estimating the burden of the opioid epidemic for adults and adolescents in Ohio counties.Biometrics · 2021Article
- A National Study of Colorectal Cancer Survivorship Disparities: A Latent Class Analysis Using SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) Registries.Frontiers in public health · 2021Article
- Spatial patterns in prostate Cancer-specific mortality in Pennsylvania using Pennsylvania Cancer registry data, 2004-2014.BMC cancer · 2020Article
- Outcomes of Patients with Early Onset Colorectal Cancer Treated in a UK Specialist Cancer Center.Cancers · 2019Article
- A Correctional-Public Health Collaboration for Colorectal Cancer Screening in a State Prison System.Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) is common worldwide, with 140,250 diagnoses and 50,630 deaths estimated for the United States in 2018. Guidelines current to the most recent individuals in our analysis suggested regular screenings beginning at age 50 have reduced the incidence of CRC. However, the incidence continues to rise among those under 50. Less is known about survival following CRC diagnosis, but research has suggested that younger cases may also have worse survival. However, we hypothesize that younger individuals are generally healthier with fewer comorbidities, leading to the potential for better survival following diagnosis. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe utilized the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data to estimate and assess both spatial and temporal variation in age-specific colorectal cancer incidence and survival in Iowa.
resultsBoth overall and older-onset colorectal cancer incidence began to decline in the early 2000s, whereas younger-onset incidences decreased until the late 1980s but then increased steeply through the 2000s. The risk for those younger than 50 years of age first exceeded the risk for those 50 years or older in 2007. Survival times did increase for overall CRC, older-onset CRC, and young-onset CRC throughout the study period, with young-onset CRC increasing at a higher rate. The spatial variation assessment indicated that the survival was positively associated with several variables of interest, most notably disparities including better access to healthcare and higher sociodemographic status.
conclusionIn conclusion, results suggest that regular colorectal screenings could reduce incidence and mortality in people under 50.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.