ArticleDisability and health journal2019
Prevalence of cerebral palsy, intellectual disability, hearing loss, and blindness, National Health Interview Survey, 2009-2016.
Article in Disability and health journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
58 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effectiveness of virtual reality for functional disorders in cerebral palsy: an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Control strategies used in lower limb exoskeletons for gait rehabilitation after brain injury: a systematic review and analysis of clinical effectiveness.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2023Pooled it
- The Effect of Physical Activity Interventions on Executive Function Among People with Neurodevelopmental Disorders: A Meta-Analysis.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2022Pooled it
- Effectiveness of powered exoskeleton use on gait in individuals with cerebral palsy: A systematic review.PloS one · 2021Pooled it
- Child Health Challenges, Ecosystem Mismatches, and the Case for State-Level Policy Innovation.The Milbank quarterly · 2026Article
- The Prevalence and Sociodemographic Characteristics of Intellectual Disability with Co-Occurring Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Learning Disability.Journal of pediatric neuropsychology · 2026Article
- HABIT-ILE@home for Children With Bilateral Cerebral Palsy: Protocol for Noninferiority and Superiority Randomized Controlled Trials.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- X-chromosomal genetic variants and haplotype analysis in male cerebral palsy patients: insights into genetic susceptibility and sex-specific risk.Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders · 2026Article
- Participation, environment, and quality of life in children with cerebral palsy and physical disabilities.Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2026Article
- Testing the performance of polygenic scores for multiple traits to explain cerebral palsy in two independent cohorts.EBioMedicine · 2026Article
- Clinician Perceptions Around Management of Sleep Problems in Children With Neurodisability.Child: care, health and development · 2026Article
- Body-weight support is the primary driver of elevated walking cost in cerebral palsy.Research square · 2026Article
- Multimodal MRI of white matter development and selective motor control in preterm infants.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2026Article
- Analysis of nutrition status and family compliance in children with cerebral palsy.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Increasing motor variability facilitates motor learning of trunk postural control during sitting in children with cerebral palsy.Journal of neurophysiology · 2025Article
- A comparative analysis of bone mineral density in cerebral palsy and spinal muscular atrophy.Bone reports · 2025Article
- A Technology-Aided Program to Help People With Intellectual and Multiple Disabilities Access Leisure Stimuli and Engage in Cognitive and Physical Activity: Development and Usability Study.JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies · 2025Article
- Sprint-Intensity Arm Interval Training May Improve Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Cardiometabolic Health Among Children With Mobility Disabilities: Case Report.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Rethinking the Accessibility of Hearing Assessments for Children with Developmental Disabilities.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2025Article
- Synergies, Discrepancies, and Action Priorities: A Statewide Engagement Study to Strengthen Clinical Research in Cerebral Palsy.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDevelopmental disabilities are present in a significant proportion of US children. Surveillance of developmental disabilities is crucial for monitoring population trends, guiding research into risk factors, and informing resource allocation. OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: We examined overall prevalence, prevalence by demographic characteristics, and trends over time for cerebral palsy (CP), intellectual disability (ID), moderate to severe hearing loss (MSHL), and blindness.
methodsData from the 2009-2016 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) were analyzed for children 3-17 years of age. Question wording was consistent over time except for ID, which changed in 2011 to replace the term "mental retardation." Demographic differences and linear trends (over three time periods) were assessed by Chi-square tests and Wald-F tests.
resultsPrevalence estimates per 1000 children ages 3-17 years for CP, ID, MSHL, and blindness were 3.2 (95% CI: 2.7, 3.7), 11.1 (95% CI: 10.2, 12.1), 6.4 (95% CI: 5.6, 7.2), and 1.6 (95% CI: 1.3, 2.0), respectively. Disability prevalence was higher for children with low birthweight and from families of lower parental education, income ≤200% of federal poverty level, and public insurance. Older children had higher ID prevalence; boys had significantly higher CP and ID prevalences. Only ID demonstrated a significantly increased trend over time (p = 0.0002).
conclusionsWe provide nationally representative prevalence estimates for four developmental disabilities; recent estimates are comparable to those from records-based studies. Prevalences were stable except for ID, which increased after 2010, coincident with the questionnaire change. A substantial number of US children continue to have these disabilities and service needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.