Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30712880›Full record

ArticleLancet (London, England)2019

Prenatal exome sequencing analysis in fetal structural anomalies detected by ultrasonography (PAGE): a cohort study.

Jenny Lord, Dominic J McMullan, Ruth Y Eberhardt, Gabriele Rinck, Susan J Hamilton, Elizabeth Quinlan-Jones, Elena Prigmore, Rebecca Keelagher, Sunayna K Best, Georgina K Carey and 34 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Lancet (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 350 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
350citing papers in PubMed, 12 pooled it
135.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

350 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 698 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Incremental yield of exome sequencing over standard prenatal testing in structurally normal fetuses: systematic review and meta-analysis.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2025
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

290 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

44 authors at 20 institutions in 1 country.

Jenny LordWellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK.
Dominic J McMullanWest Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's and Children's National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Ruth Y EberhardtWellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK.
Gabriele RinckWellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK.
Susan J HamiltonWest Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's and Children's National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Elizabeth Quinlan-JonesWest Midlands Fetal Medicine Centre, Birmingham Women's and Children's National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK; Centre for Women's and Newborn Health, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Elena PrigmoreWellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK.
Rebecca KeelagherWest Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's and Children's National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Sunayna K BestNorth East Thames Regional Genetics Service, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, Great Ormond Street NHS Foundation Trust, London UK.
Georgina K CareyWest Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's and Children's National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Rhiannon MellisNorth East Thames Regional Genetics Service, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, Great Ormond Street NHS Foundation Trust, London UK.
Sarah RobartNorth East Thames Regional Genetics Service, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, Great Ormond Street NHS Foundation Trust, London UK.
Ian R BerryThe Leeds Genetics Laboratory, St James's University Hospital, Yorkshire Regional Genetics Service, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Kate E ChandlerManchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
Deirdre CilliersOxford Genomic Medicine Centre, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford, UK.
Lara CresswellDepartment of Cytogenetics, Leicester Royal Infirmary, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.
Sandra L EdwardsCytogenetics Service, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK.
Carol GardinerWest of Scotland Genetics Services, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
Alex HendersonNorthern Genetics Service, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Simon T HoldenDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Tessa HomfraySouth West Thames Regional Genetics Centre, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Tracy LesterOxford Regional Genetics Services, The Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Rebecca A LewisBristol Genetics Laboratory, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
Ruth Newbury-EcobDepartment of Clinical Genetics, St Michael's Hospital, University Hospitals Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Katrina PrescottChapel Allerton Hospital, Yorkshire Regional Genetics Service, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Oliver W QuarrellDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Simon C RamsdenManchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
Eileen RobertsBristol Genetics Laboratory, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
Dagmar TaponCentre for Fetal Care, Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Madeleine J TooleyDepartment of Clinical Genetics, St Michael's Hospital, University Hospitals Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Pradeep C VasudevanDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Leicester Royal Infirmary, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.
Astrid P WeberDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Diana G WellesleyFaculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK; Wessex Regional Clinical Genetics Service, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Paul WestwoodWest of Scotland Genetics Services, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
Helen WhiteFaculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK; Wessex Regional Clinical Genetics Service, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Michael ParkerThe Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health and Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Denise WilliamsWest Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's and Children's National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Lucy JenkinsNorth East Thames Regional Genetics Service, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, Great Ormond Street NHS Foundation Trust, London UK.
Richard H ScottNorth East Thames Regional Genetics Service, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, Great Ormond Street NHS Foundation Trust, London UK.
Mark D KilbyWest Midlands Fetal Medicine Centre, Birmingham Women's and Children's National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK; Centre for Women's and Newborn Health, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Lyn S ChittyNorth East Thames Regional Genetics Service, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, Great Ormond Street NHS Foundation Trust, London UK.
Matthew E HurlesWellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK.
Eamonn R MaherDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK; Department of Medical Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, National Institute for Health Research, Cambridge, UK. Electronic address: erm1000@medschl.cam.ac.uk.
Prenatal Assessment of Genomes and Exomes Consortium
Wellcome Sanger Institute · GBBirmingham Women’s and Children’s NHS Foundation Trust · GBGreat Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust · GBNational Health Service · GBUniversity College London · GBNorth Bristol NHS Trust · GBQueen Elizabeth University Hospital · GBSt Michael’s Hospital · GBLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · GBManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GBCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBLeicester Royal Infirmary · GBNewcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBNorfolk and Norwich University Hospital · GBNuffield Orthopaedic Centre · GBQueen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital · GBSheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust · GBSt George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFetal structural anomalies, which are detected by ultrasonography, have a range of genetic causes, including chromosomal aneuploidy, copy number variations (CNVs; which are detectable by chromosomal microarrays), and pathogenic sequence variants in developmental genes. Testing for aneuploidy and CNVs is routine during the investigation of fetal structural anomalies, but there is little information on the clinical usefulness of genome-wide next-generation sequencing in the prenatal setting. We therefore aimed to evaluate the proportion of fetuses with structural abnormalities that had identifiable variants in genes associated with developmental disorders when assessed with whole-exome sequencing (WES).

methodsIn this prospective cohort study, two groups in Birmingham and London recruited patients from 34 fetal medicine units in England and Scotland. We used whole-exome sequencing (WES) to evaluate the presence of genetic variants in developmental disorder genes (diagnostic genetic variants) in a cohort of fetuses with structural anomalies and samples from their parents, after exclusion of aneuploidy and large CNVs. Women were eligible for inclusion if they were undergoing invasive testing for identified nuchal translucency or structural anomalies in their fetus, as detected by ultrasound after 11 weeks of gestation. The partners of these women also had to consent to participate. Sequencing results were interpreted with a targeted virtual gene panel for developmental disorders that comprised 1628 genes. Genetic results related to fetal structural anomaly phenotypes were then validated and reported postnatally. The primary endpoint, which was assessed in all fetuses, was the detection of diagnostic genetic variants considered to have caused the fetal developmental anomaly.

findingsThe cohort was recruited between Oct 22, 2014, and June 29, 2017, and clinical data were collected until March 31, 2018. After exclusion of fetuses with aneuploidy and CNVs, 610 fetuses with structural anomalies and 1202 matched parental samples (analysed as 596 fetus-parental trios, including two sets of twins, and 14 fetus-parent dyads) were analysed by WES. After bioinformatic filtering and prioritisation according to allele frequency and effect on protein and inheritance pattern, 321 genetic variants (representing 255 potential diagnoses) were selected as potentially pathogenic genetic variants (diagnostic genetic variants), and these variants were reviewed by a multidisciplinary clinical review panel. A diagnostic genetic variant was identified in 52 (8·5%; 95% CI 6·4-11·0) of 610 fetuses assessed and an additional 24 (3·9%) fetuses had a variant of uncertain significance that had potential clinical usefulness. Detection of diagnostic genetic variants enabled us to distinguish between syndromic and non-syndromic fetal anomalies (eg, congenital heart disease only vs a syndrome with congenital heart disease and learning disability). Diagnostic genetic variants were present in 22 (15·4%) of 143 fetuses with multisystem anomalies (ie, more than one fetal structural anomaly), nine (11·1%) of 81 fetuses with cardiac anomalies, and ten (15·4%) of 65 fetuses with skeletal anomalies; these phenotypes were most commonly associated with diagnostic variants. However, diagnostic genetic variants were least common in fetuses with isolated increased nuchal translucency (≥4·0 mm) in the first trimester (in three [3·2%] of 93 fetuses).

interpretationWES facilitates genetic diagnosis of fetal structural anomalies, which enables more accurate predictions of fetal prognosis and risk of recurrence in future pregnancies. However, the overall detection of diagnostic genetic variants in a prospectively ascertained cohort with a broad range of fetal structural anomalies is lower than that suggested by previous smaller-scale studies of fewer phenotypes. WES improved the identification of genetic disorders in fetuses with structural abnormalities; however, before clinical implementation, careful consideration should be given to case selection to maximise clinical usefulness.

fundingUK Department of Health and Social Care and The Wellcome Trust.

Indexed as

Abnormal KaryotypeAbortion, EugenicAbortion, SpontaneousCongenital AbnormalitiesDNA Copy Number VariationsExome SequencingFemaleFetal DevelopmentFetusHumansInfant, NewbornLive BirthMaleNuchal Translucency MeasurementParentsPerinatal Death

Identifiers

PMID30712880
PMCPMC6386638
OpenAlexW2910583407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.