Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30712507›Full record

ArticleGlobal health action2019

Outcomes and implementation challenges of using daily treatment regimens with an innovative adherence support tool among HIV-infected tuberculosis patients in Karnataka, India: a mixed-methods study.

Pruthu Thekkur, Ajay Nv Kumar, Palanivel Chinnakali, Sriram Selvaraju, Ramachandra Bairy, Akash Ranjan Singh, Abhay Nirgude, Kalaiselvi Selvaraj, Vinayagamoorthy Venugopal, Suresh Shastri

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Global health action, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. eHealth in TB clinical management.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2022
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Pruthu Thekkura Centre for Operational Research , International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease , New Delhi , India.ORCID 0000-0001-5257-5074
Ajay Nv Kumara Centre for Operational Research , International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease , New Delhi , India.ORCID 0000-0003-1011-8531
Palanivel Chinnakalic Department of Preventive and Social Medicine , Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER) , Puducherry , India.ORCID 0000-0001-8320-1016
Sriram Selvarajud Epidemiology Unit , National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis , Chennai , India.ORCID 0000-0003-0369-6640
Ramachandra Bairye Department of Health and Family Welfare Services , Bengaluru , Karnataka , India.
Akash Ranjan Singhf Department of Community Medicine , All India Institute of Medical Sciences , Bhopal , Madhya Pradesh , India.ORCID 0000-0003-0553-1559
Abhay Nirgudeg Department of Community Medicine , Yenepoya Medical College , Mangalore , Karnataka , India.ORCID 0000-0002-8687-7094
Kalaiselvi Selvarajh Department of Community Medicine , Pondicherry Institute of Medical Sciences , Pondicherry , India.
Vinayagamoorthy Venugopali Department of Community Medicine , Sri Manakula Vinayagar Medical College and Hospital , Pondicherry , India.
Suresh Shastrie Department of Health and Family Welfare Services , Bengaluru , Karnataka , India.
International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · FRAll India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhopal · INJawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research · INNational Institute of Research in Tuberculosis · INPondicherry Institute of Medical Sciences · INSri Manakula Vinayagar Medical College and Hospital · INYenepoya University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn India, a new care package consisting of (i) daily regimen with fixed-dose combination drugs, collected once-a-month and self-administered by the patient, (ii) 'one stop service' at antiretroviral treatment (ART) centre for both HIV and tuberculosis (TB) treatment and (iii) technology-enabled adherence support (99DOTS, which required patients to give a missed phone call after consuming drugs) was piloted for treatment of TB among HIV-infected TB patients. Conventional care included intermittent regimen (drugs consumed thrice-weekly) delivered under direct observation of treatment supporter and the patients needing to visit TB and HIV care facilities, separately for treatment.

objectiveTo assess the effect of new care package on TB treatment outcomes among HIV-TB patients registered during January-December 2016, as compared to conventional care and explore the implementation challenges.

methodsA mixed-methods study was conducted in four districts of Karnataka, India where new care package was piloted in few ART centres while the rest provided conventional care. Quantitative component involved a secondary cohort analysis of routine programme data. Adjusted relative risk(aRR) was calculated using Poisson regression to measure association between new care package and unsuccessful treatment outcome. We conducted in-depth interviews with healthcare providers and patients to understand the challenges.

resultsUnsuccessful TB treatment outcomes (death, loss to follow-up and failure) were higher in new care package (n = 871) compared to conventional care (n = 961) (30.5% vs 23.4%; P value<0.001) and aRR was 1.3(95% CI: 1.1-1.7). Key challenges included patients' inability to give missed call, increased work load for ART staff, reduced patient-provider interaction, deficiencies in training and lack of role clarity among providers and reduced involvement of TB program staff.

conclusionWith new care package, TB treatment outcomes did not improve as expected and conversely declined compared to conventional care. TB and HIV programs need to address the operational challenges to improve the outcomes.

Indexed as

Patient ComplianceAdolescentAdultAnti-Retroviral AgentsAntitubercular AgentsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansIndiaInfantInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CareAnti-Retroviral AgentsAntitubercular Agents99DOTSe-healthm-healthoperational researchSelf-administered treatmentSORT IT

Identifiers

PMID30712507
PMCPMC6366428
OpenAlexW2914887856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.