Trial reportCirculation. Cardiovascular imaging2019
Predictive Model for High-Risk Coronary Artery Disease.
Trial report in Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01174550 (PROspective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain - The PROMISE Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
PROspective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain - The PROMISE Trial
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Genetic Determinants of Coronary Artery Disease in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Among Asian Populations: A Meta-Analysis.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Pooled it
- Impact of smoking in patients with suspected coronary artery disease in the randomised DISCHARGE trial.European radiology · 2024Trial
- Randomised trial of stable chest pain investigation: 3-year clinical and quality of life results from CE-MARC 2.Open heart · 2023Trial
- Data-driven atherosclerotic plaque profiles from QAngio-CT associated with functional impairments assessed with PET-CT.Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico · 2026Article
- Assessing extensive coronary artery disease using a myocardial jeopardy score based on coronary CT: long-term prognostic value.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2025Article
- Two birds with one stone: pre-TAVI coronary CT angiography combined with FFR helps screen for coronary stenosis.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Specificity and Areas of Usage of Cardiovascular Prediction Models Among Athletes-State-of-the-art Review.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Development and validation of a novel coronary artery disease risk prediction model.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Review
- The Relationship between Left Ventricular Diastolic Function Parameters and Coronary Artery Disease Severity.Iranian journal of medical sciences · 2024Article
- Comparison of the RF-CL and CACS-CL models to estimate the pretest probability of obstructive coronary artery disease and predict prognosis in patients with stable chest pain and diabetes mellitus.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Increasing frequency of dyspnea among patients referred for cardiac stress testing.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023Article
- Reframing the Paradigm for Assessing Optimal Test Selection When Suspecting Chronic Coronary Disease.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Article
- The Role of Cardiac PET in Diagnosis and Prognosis of Ischemic Heart Disease: Optimal Modality Across Different Patient Populations.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2023Review
- Comparison of risk assessment strategies incorporating coronary artery calcium score with estimation of pretest probability to defer cardiovascular testing in patients with stable chest pain.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2023Article
- Physician judgement in predicting obstructive coronary artery disease and adverse events in chest pain patients.Heart (British Cardiac Society) · 2022Article
- Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting significant coronary artery stenosis in suspected non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary artery syndrome with low-to-intermediate risk stratification.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Non-invasive Global and Regional Myocardial Work Predicts High-Risk Stable Coronary Artery Disease Patients With Normal Segmental Wall Motion and Left Ventricular Function.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Article
- Classifiers for Predicting Coronary Artery Disease Based on Gene Expression Profiles in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells.International journal of general medicine · 2021Article
- Analysis of Diabetes Mellitus-Related Amputations in the State of Espírito Santo, Brazil.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPatients with high-risk coronary artery disease (CAD) may be difficult to identify.
methodsUsing the PROMISE (Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain) cohort randomized to coronary computed tomographic angiography (n=4589), 2 predictive models were developed for high-risk CAD, defined as left main stenosis (≥50% stenosis) or either (1) ≥50% stenosis [50] or (2) ≥70% stenosis [70] of 3 vessels or 2-vessel CAD involving the proximal left anterior descending artery. Pretest predictors were examined using stepwise logistic regression and assessed for discrimination and calibration.
resultsHigh-risk CAD was identified in 6.6% [50] and 2.4% [70] of patients. Models developed to predict high-risk CAD discriminated well: [50], bias-corrected C statistic=0.73 (95% CI, 0.71-0.76); [70], bias-corrected C statistic=0.73 (95% CI, 0.68-0.77). Variables predictive of CAD in both models included family history of premature CAD, age, male sex, lower glomerular filtration rate, diabetes mellitus, elevated systolic blood pressure, and angina. Additionally, smoking history was predictive of [50] CAD and sedentary lifestyle of [70] CAD. Both models characterized high-risk CAD better than the Pooled Cohort Equation (area under the curve=0.70 and 0.71 for [50] and [70], respectively) and Diamond-Forrester risk scores (area under the curve=0.68 and 0.71, respectively). Both [50] and [70] CAD was associated with more frequent invasive interventions and adverse events than non-high-risk CAD (all P<0.0001).
conclusionsIn contemporary practice, 2.4% to 6.6% of stable, symptomatic patients requiring noninvasive testing have high-risk CAD. A simple combination of pretest clinical variables improves prediction of high-risk CAD over traditional risk assessments. CLINICAL
trial registrationURL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01174550.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.