Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30712364›Full record

Trial reportCirculation. Cardiovascular imaging2019

Predictive Model for High-Risk Coronary Artery Disease.

James J Jang, Manjushri Bhapkar, Adrian Coles, Sreekanth Vemulapalli, Christopher B Fordyce, Kerry L Lee, James E Udelson, Udo Hoffmann, Jean-Claude Tardif, W Schuyler Jones and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01174550 (PROspective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain - The PROMISE Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01174550 nacompletednot on this map

PROspective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain - The PROMISE Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorDuke UniversityRan2010 to 2014Enrolled10,003ConditionsChest PainArmsCoronary Angiography, Stress Echocardiogram, Nuclear Stress Test, Exercise Electrocardiogram
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. International journal of general medicine · 2024
    Article
  12. Increasing frequency of dyspnea among patients referred for cardiac stress testing.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

James J JangSan Jose Medical Center, Kaiser Permanente, CA (J.J.J.).
Manjushri BhapkarDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (M.B., A.C., S.V., C.B.F., K.L.L., W.S.J., D.B.M., P.S.D., M.R.P.).
Adrian ColesDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (M.B., A.C., S.V., C.B.F., K.L.L., W.S.J., D.B.M., P.S.D., M.R.P.).
Sreekanth VemulapalliDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (M.B., A.C., S.V., C.B.F., K.L.L., W.S.J., D.B.M., P.S.D., M.R.P.).
Christopher B FordyceDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (M.B., A.C., S.V., C.B.F., K.L.L., W.S.J., D.B.M., P.S.D., M.R.P.).
Kerry L LeeDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (M.B., A.C., S.V., C.B.F., K.L.L., W.S.J., D.B.M., P.S.D., M.R.P.).
James E UdelsonDepartment of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA (J.E.U.).
Udo HoffmannMassachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (U.H.).
Jean-Claude TardifResearch Centre, Montreal Heart Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (J.-C.T.).
W Schuyler JonesDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (M.B., A.C., S.V., C.B.F., K.L.L., W.S.J., D.B.M., P.S.D., M.R.P.).
Daniel B MarkDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (M.B., A.C., S.V., C.B.F., K.L.L., W.S.J., D.B.M., P.S.D., M.R.P.).
Vincent L SorrellUniversity of Kentucky Hospital, Lexington, KY (V.L.S.).
Andrey EspinozaHunterdon Medical Center, Flemington, NJ (A.E.).
Pamela S DouglasDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (M.B., A.C., S.V., C.B.F., K.L.L., W.S.J., D.B.M., P.S.D., M.R.P.).
Manesh R PatelDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (M.B., A.C., S.V., C.B.F., K.L.L., W.S.J., D.B.M., P.S.D., M.R.P.).
PROMISE Investigators

Funding

PROMISE Trial: Clinical Coordinating CenterR01HL098237 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI DOUGLAS, PAMELA SUSAN · 2009 to 2014
$27.3M
PROMISE Trial: SDCCR01HL098236 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI LEE, KERRY L · 2009 to 2014
$5.0M
PROMISE Trial: Dx CoreR01HL098305 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI HOFFMANN, UDO · 2009 to 2014
$3.5M
PROMISE Trial: EQOL Coordinating CenterR01HL098235 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MARK, DANIEL B · 2009 to 2014
$1.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL098235NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL098236NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL098237NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL098305
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with high-risk coronary artery disease (CAD) may be difficult to identify.

methodsUsing the PROMISE (Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain) cohort randomized to coronary computed tomographic angiography (n=4589), 2 predictive models were developed for high-risk CAD, defined as left main stenosis (≥50% stenosis) or either (1) ≥50% stenosis [50] or (2) ≥70% stenosis [70] of 3 vessels or 2-vessel CAD involving the proximal left anterior descending artery. Pretest predictors were examined using stepwise logistic regression and assessed for discrimination and calibration.

resultsHigh-risk CAD was identified in 6.6% [50] and 2.4% [70] of patients. Models developed to predict high-risk CAD discriminated well: [50], bias-corrected C statistic=0.73 (95% CI, 0.71-0.76); [70], bias-corrected C statistic=0.73 (95% CI, 0.68-0.77). Variables predictive of CAD in both models included family history of premature CAD, age, male sex, lower glomerular filtration rate, diabetes mellitus, elevated systolic blood pressure, and angina. Additionally, smoking history was predictive of [50] CAD and sedentary lifestyle of [70] CAD. Both models characterized high-risk CAD better than the Pooled Cohort Equation (area under the curve=0.70 and 0.71 for [50] and [70], respectively) and Diamond-Forrester risk scores (area under the curve=0.68 and 0.71, respectively). Both [50] and [70] CAD was associated with more frequent invasive interventions and adverse events than non-high-risk CAD (all P<0.0001).

conclusionsIn contemporary practice, 2.4% to 6.6% of stable, symptomatic patients requiring noninvasive testing have high-risk CAD. A simple combination of pretest clinical variables improves prediction of high-risk CAD over traditional risk assessments. CLINICAL

trial registrationURL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01174550.

Indexed as

Computed Tomography AngiographyDecision Support TechniquesAgedCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary StenosisFemaleHealth StatusHumansMaleMiddle AgedNorth AmericaPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisProspective StudiesRisk Assessmentangiographycoronary artery diseaserisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID30712364
PMCPMC6368397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.