Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30712225›Full record

ArticleIntegrative psychological & behavioral science2019

Beyond the Meaning Given. The Meaning as Explanandum.

Sergio Salvatore

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Integrative psychological & behavioral science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Redefining Meaning: A Micro-Genetic Model of the Constitution of Experience.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2024
    Article
  3. Social Environment and Attitudes toward COVID-19 Anti-Contagious Measures: An Explorative Study from Italy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Dialogues in Infertility: Exploring the Potential for Psychological Adaptation.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Bruner and Beyond: a Commentary.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2019
    Article
  8. Jerome Seymour Bruner: an Anticipator Scientist for an Anticipation Theory.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2019
    Article
  9. Beyond the Anomaly: Where Piaget and Bruner Meet.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2019
    Article
  10. Beyond Past and Present: Meaning Making, Narrative Self and Future-Orientation.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sergio SalvatoreUniversity of Salento, via Stampacchia 42, 73100, Lecce, Italy. sergio.salvatore65@icloud.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4583-8478

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The paper starts from the recognition of Bruner's contribution to the development of psychological science. It is claimed here that to proceed in that direction requires the building of an analytical notion of meaning. This analytical notion should distinguish between meaning-making and sensemaking, namely between the processes of elaboration and use of meaning (meaning-making) and the processes that makes the meaning emerge to be lived as psychological reality (sense-making). In order to discuss this distinction, two main issues are addressed - the limit of the hypostatized view of meaning and the dynamics of presentification through which meaning is endowed with value of life. These two issues are complementary - together they push psychology to search for a theoretical and methodological framework where meaning can be investigated as an emergent psychological phenomenon, and not only taken for granted as a premise.

Indexed as

Psychological TheoryPsychologyScienceHumansMeaning makingSense-making

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.