Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30711909›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in psychology2019

Cholinergic double duty: cue detection and attentional control.

Martin Sarter, Cindy Lustig

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Combined Dysfunction of the Amygdala and Nucleus Basalis Underlies Visual Hallucinations in Parkinson's Disease.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Cholinergic System Changes in Dopa-Unresponsive Freezing of Gait in Parkinson's Disease.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Martin SarterDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States. Electronic address: msarter@umich.edu.
Cindy LustigDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States.

Funding

Public Outreach and Education CoreP50NS091856 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ALBIN, ROGER L · 2014 to 2019
$10.1M
Variation in Motivational Properties of Reward Cues: Implications for AddictionP01DA031656 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ROBINSON, TERRY E. · 2012 to 2016
$6.3M
Addiction liability, poor attentional control, and cholinergic deficiencyR01DA045063 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SARTER, MARTIN F · 2018 to 2022
$1.9M
NIDA NIH HHS P01 DA031656NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA045063NINDS NIH HHS P50 NS091856
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cholinergic signaling in the cortex involves fast or transient signaling as well as a relatively slower neuromodulatory component. These two components of cholinergic activity mediate separate yet interacting aspects of cue detection and attentional control. The transient component appears to support the activation of cue-associated task or response sets, whereas the slower modulatory component stabilizes task-set and context representations, therefore potentially facilitating top-down control. Evidence from humans expressing genetic variants of the choline transporter as well as from patients with degenerating cholinergic systems supports the hypothesis that attentional control capacities depend on levels of cholinergic neuromodulation. Deficits in cholinergic-attentional control impact diverse cognitive functions, including timing, working memory, and complex movement control.

Indexed as

CuesAcetylcholineAnimalsAttentionBrainCerebral CortexCognitionHumansMiceRatsAcetylcholine

Identifiers

PMID30711909
PMCPMC6609491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.