Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30711721›Full record

SynthesisCurrent opinion in chemical biology2019

Assessing sub-cellular resolution in spatial proteomics experiments.

Laurent Gatto, Lisa M Breckels, Kathryn S Lilley

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Current opinion in chemical biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Subcellular proteomics.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Laurent GattoComputational Proteomics Unit, Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge, CB2 1QR, UK; Cambridge Centre for Proteomics, Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge, CB2 1QR, UK; de Duve Institute, UCLouvain, Avenue Hippocrate 75, 1200 Brussels, Belgium. Electronic address: laurent.gatto@uclouvain.be.
Lisa M BreckelsComputational Proteomics Unit, Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge, CB2 1QR, UK; Cambridge Centre for Proteomics, Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge, CB2 1QR, UK.
Kathryn S LilleyCambridge Centre for Proteomics, Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge, CB2 1QR, UK.
University of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L002817/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N023129/1Wellcome Trust 108441/Z/15/ZWellcome Trust 110170/Z/15/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sub-cellular localisation of a protein is vital in defining its function, and a protein's mis-localisation is known to lead to adverse effect. As a result, numerous experimental techniques and datasets have been published, with the aim of deciphering the localisation of proteins at various scales and resolutions, including high profile mass spectrometry-based efforts. Here, we present a meta-analysis assessing and comparing the sub-cellular resolution of 29 such mass spectrometry-based spatial proteomics experiments using a newly developed tool termed QSep. Our goal is to provide a simple quantitative report of how well spatial proteomics resolve the sub-cellular niches they describe to inform and guide developers and users of such methods.

Indexed as

AnimalsCellular StructuresHumansMass SpectrometryProteinsProteomicsProteins

Identifiers

PMID30711721
PMCPMC6391913
OpenAlexW2952042803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.