Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30711536›Full record

ArticleMolecular phylogenetics and evolution2019

A well supported multi gene phylogeny of 52 dictyostelia.

Christina Schilde, Hajara M Lawal, Koryu Kin, Ikumi Shibano-Hayakawa, Kei Inouye, Pauline Schaap

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular phylogenetics and evolution, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Nonribosomal peptides protectChemical science · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. The complete mitochondrial genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christina SchildeSchool of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee DD15EH, UK.
Hajara M LawalSchool of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee DD15EH, UK.
Koryu KinSchool of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee DD15EH, UK.
Ikumi Shibano-HayakawaDepartment of Physics, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan; Department of Botany, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan.
Kei InouyeDepartment of Botany, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan.
Pauline SchaapSchool of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee DD15EH, UK. Electronic address: p.schaap@dundee.ac.uk.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 100293/Z/12/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Dictyostelid social amoebas are a popular model system for cell- and developmental biology and for evolution of sociality. Small subunit (SSU) ribosomal DNA-based phylogenies subdivide the known 150 species into four major and some minor groups, but lack resolution within groups, particularly group 4, and, as shown by genome-based phylogenies of 11 species, showed errors in the position of the root and nodes separating major clades. We are interested in the evolution of cell-type specialization, which particularly expanded in group 4. To construct a more robust phylogeny, we first included 7 recently sequenced genomes in the genome-based phylogeny of 47 functionally divergent proteins and next selected 6 proteins (Agl, AmdA, PurD, PurL, RpaA, SmdA) that independently or in sets of two fully reproduced the core-phylogeny. We amplified their coding regions from 34 Dictyostelium species and combined their concatenated sequences with those identified in the 18 genomes to generate a fully resolved phylogeny. The new AAPPRS based phylogeny (after the acronym of the 6 proteins) subdivides group 4 into 2 branches. These branches further resolve into 5 clades, rather than the progressively nested group 4 topology of the SSU rDNA tree, and also re-orders taxa in the other major groups. Ancestral state reconstruction of 25 phenotypic traits returned higher "goodness of fit" metrics for evolution of 19 of those traits over the AAPPRS tree, than over the SSU rDNA tree. The novel tree provides a solid framework for studying the evolution of cell-type specialization, signalling and other cellular processes in particularly group 4, which contains the model Dictyostelid D. discoideum.

Indexed as

PhylogenyBase SequenceDictyosteliumGenomeProtozoan ProteinsSelection, GeneticSpecies SpecificityProtozoan ProteinsAncestral state reconstructionDictyosteliaDictyostelium caveatumPhylogenetic marker genesPhylogenomicsPolysphondylium multicystogenum

Identifiers

PMID30711536
PMCPMC6430600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.