Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30711457›Full record

SynthesisReproductive biomedicine online2019

Does theFMR1 gene affect IVF success?

Lisa M Pastore, Mindy S Christianson, Bailey McGuinness, Kamaria Cayton Vaught, Jacqueline Y Maher, William G Kearns

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Reproductive biomedicine online, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Prevalence of theGenes · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Defining the role of FMR1 gene in unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lisa M PastoreOB/GYN and Reproductive Medicine Department, Stony Brook Medicine, Stony Brook, New York USA.
Mindy S ChristiansonDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore MD, USA.
Bailey McGuinnessNew York University, Winthrop Hospital, Mineola NY, USA.
Kamaria Cayton VaughtDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore MD, USA.
Jacqueline Y MaherDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore MD, USA.
William G KearnsAdvaGenix, Rockville MD, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USStony Brook Medicine · USWinthrop-University Hospital · US

Funding

Postdoctoral Medical Genetics Training GrantT32GM007471 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI TAO WANG · 1985 to 2026
$8.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007471
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

FMR1 CGG trinucleotide repeat expansions are associated with Fragile X syndrome (full mutations) and primary ovarian insufficiency (premutation range); the effect of FMR1 on the success of fertility treatment is unclear. The effect of FMR1 CGG repeat lengths on IVF outcomes after ovarian stimulation was reviewed. PubMed was searched for studies on IVF-related outcomes reported by FMR1 trinucleotide repeat length published between 2002 and December 2017. For women with CGG repeats in the normal (<45 CGG), intermediate range (45-54 CGG), or both, research supports a minimal effect on IVF outcomes, including pregnancy rates; although one study reported lower oocyte yields after IVF stimulation in women with lower CGG repeat lengths and normal ovarian reserve. Meta-analysis revealed no association within subcategories of normal repeat length (<45 CGG) and IVF pregnancy rates (summary OR 1.0, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.15). Premutation carriers (CGG 55-200) may have reduced success with IVF treatment (lower oocyte yield) than women with a normal CGG repeat length or a full mutation, although findings are inconsistent. Direct implications of the repeat length on inheritance and the risk of Fragile X syndrome have been observed. Patients may require clinical and psychological counselling, and further preimplantation genetic testing options should be considered. Thus, there are clinical and psychological counseling implications for patients and potential further patient decisions regarding preimplantation genetic testing options.

Indexed as

Fertilization in VitroTrinucleotide Repeat ExpansionTrinucleotide RepeatsAdultFemaleFertilityFragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein 1Fragile X SyndromeGenotypeHeterozygoteHumansInfertility, FemaleMaleMaternal AgeMiddle AgedOocyte RetrievalFMR1 protein, humanFragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein 1Assisted reproductive technologiesFemale infertilityFertilization rateFMR1Fragile X syndromeIn vitro fertilizationoocyte yield

Identifiers

PMID30711457
PMCPMC7001757
OpenAlexW2905316682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.