Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30711002›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2019

Imaging use for low back pain by Ontario primary care clinicians: protocol for a mixed methods study - the Back ON study.

Simon D French, Michael E Green, R Sacha Bhatia, Yingwei Peng, Jill A Hayden, Jan Hartvigsen, Noah M Ivers, Jeremy M Grimshaw, Christopher M Booth, Lucia Rühland and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pertinence of magnetic resonance imaging in lumbar pain: a prospective surgeon-based evaluation of diagnostic concordance and therapeutic impact.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Simon D FrenchSchool of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada. simon.french@mq.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7061-7706
Michael E GreenDepartment of Family Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
R Sacha BhatiaChoosing Wisely Canada, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Yingwei PengDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Jill A HaydenCommunity Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Jan HartvigsenDepartment of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Noah M IversInstitute for Health Systems Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Jeremy M GrimshawClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Christopher M BoothQueen's Cancer Research Institute, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Lucia RühlandSchool of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Kathleen E NormanSchool of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Queen's University · CAUniversity of Toronto · CADalhousie University · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CAUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research FRN 153164
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAt any one time, one in every five Canadians has low back pain (LBP), and LBP is one of the most common health problems in primary care. Guidelines recommend that imaging not be routinely performed in patients presenting with LBP without signs or symptoms indicating a potential pathological cause. Yet imaging rates remain high for many patients who present without such indications. Inappropriate imaging can lead to inappropriate treatments, results in worse health outcomes and causes harm from unnecessary radiation. There is a need to understand the extent of, and factors contributing to, inappropriate imaging for LBP, and to develop effective strategies that target modifiable barriers and facilitators. The primary study objectives are to determine: 1) The rate of, and factors associated with, inappropriate lumbar spine imaging (x-ray, CT scan and MRI) for people with non-specific LBP presenting to primary care clinicians in Ontario; 2) The barriers and facilitators to reduce inappropriate imaging for LBP in primary care settings.

methodsThe project will comprise an inception cohort study and a concurrent qualitative study. For the cohort study, we will recruit 175 primary care clinicians (50 each from physiotherapy and chiropractic; 75 from family medicine), and 3750 patients with a new episode of LBP who present to these clinicians. Clinicians will collect data in the clinic, and each participant will be tracked for 12 months using Ontario health administrative and self-reported data to measure diagnostic imaging use and other health outcomes. We will assess characteristics of the clinicians, patients and encounters to identify variables associated with inappropriate imaging. In the qualitative study we will conduct in-depth interviews with primary care clinicians and patients. DISCUSSION: This will be the first Canadian study to accurately document the extent of the overuse of imaging for LBP, and the first worldwide to include data from the main healthcare professions offering primary care for people with LBP. This study will provide robust information about rates of inappropriate imaging for LBP, along with factors associated with, and an understanding of, potential reasons for inappropriate imaging.

Indexed as

Research DesignChiropracticClinical Decision-MakingHealth Services ResearchHumansLow Back PainLumbar VertebraeMagnetic Resonance ImagingMedical OveruseOntarioPhysical TherapistsPhysicians, FamilyPractice Patterns, Physicians'Predictive Value of TestsPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchAdministrative data analysisCohort studyDiagnostic imagingLow back painPrimary careQualitative study

Identifiers

PMID30711002
PMCPMC6359752
OpenAlexW2914600963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.