Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30710562›Full record

ArticleJournal of immunological methods2019

Optimisation, harmonisation and standardisation of the direct mycobacterial growth inhibition assay using cryopreserved human peripheral blood mononuclear cells.

Rachel Tanner, Steven G Smith, Krista E van Meijgaarden, Federico Giannoni, Morven Wilkie, Lucia Gabriele, Carla Palma, Hazel M Dockrell, Tom H M Ottenhoff, Helen McShane

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immunological methods, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Future Prospects for Using Clinical Phenotypes in Tuberculosis Precision Medicine-An Approach for Clinical Management.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. TheF1000Research · 2021
    Article
  15. Innate Immune Responses ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Frontiers in immunology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Rachel TannerThe Jenner Institute, University of Oxford, UK. Electronic address: rachel.tanner@ndm.ox.ac.uk.
Steven G SmithDepartment of Immunology and Infection, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK.
Krista E van MeijgaardenDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Federico GiannoniDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Italy.
Morven WilkieThe Jenner Institute, University of Oxford, UK.
Lucia GabrieleDepartment of Oncology and Molecular Medicine, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Italy.
Carla PalmaDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Italy.
Hazel M DockrellDepartment of Immunology and Infection, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK.
Tom H M OttenhoffDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Helen McShaneThe Jenner Institute, University of Oxford, UK.
Istituto Superiore di Sanità · ITUniversity of Oxford · GBLeiden University Medical Center · NLLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GB

Funding

Department of HealthWellcome Trust 206331/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A major challenge to tuberculosis (TB) vaccine development is the lack of a validated immune correlate of protection. Mycobacterial growth inhibition assays (MGIAs) represent an unbiased measure of the ability to control mycobacterial growth in vitro. A successful MGIA could be applied to preclinical and clinical post-vaccination samples to aid in the selection of novel vaccine candidates at an early stage and provide a relevant measure of immunogenicity and protection. However, assay harmonisation is critical to ensure that comparable information can be extracted from different vaccine studies. As part of the FP7 European Research Infrastructures for Poverty Related Diseases (EURIPRED) consortium, we aimed to optimise the direct MGIA, assess repeatability and reproducibility, and harmonise the assay across different laboratories. We observed an improvement in repeatability with increased cell number and increased mycobacterial input. Furthermore, we determined that co-culturing in static 48-well plates compared with rotating 2 ml tubes resulted in a 23% increase in cell viability and a 500-fold increase in interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) production on average, as well as improved reproducibility between replicates, assay runs and sites. Applying the optimised conditions, we report repeatability to be <5% coefficient of variation (CV), intermediate precision to be <20% CV, and inter-site reproducibility to be <30% CV; levels within acceptable limits for a functional cell-based assay. Using relevant clinical samples, we demonstrated comparable results across two shared sample sets at three sites. Based on these findings, we have established a standardised operating procedure (SOP) for the use of the direct PBMC MGIA in TB vaccine development.

Indexed as

Bacteriological TechniquesCell Culture TechniquesCells, CulturedCryopreservationDrug DevelopmentHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansInterferon-gammaInterferon-gamma Release TestsLeukocytes, MononuclearMycobacterium bovisReproducibility of ResultsTuberculosis VaccinesIFNG protein, humanInterferon-gammaTuberculosis VaccinesHarmonisationMGIAMycobacterial growth inhibition assayTuberculosisVaccine

Identifiers

PMID30710562
PMCPMC7926177
OpenAlexW2911658385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.