Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30710534›Full record

ArticleActa tropica2019

Geometric morphometrics approach towards discrimination of three member species of Maculatus group in Thailand.

Tanawat Chaiphongpachara, Patchara Sriwichai, Yudthana Samung, Jiraporn Ruangsittichai, Ronald Enrique Morales Vargas, Liwang Cui, Jetsumon Sattabongkot, Jean-Pierre Dujardin, Suchada Sumruayphol

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta tropica, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Intraspecific variation in wing geometry amongFrontiers in veterinary science · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tanawat ChaiphongpacharaDepartment of Medical Entomology, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Patchara SriwichaiDepartment of Medical Entomology, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Yudthana SamungDepartment of Medical Entomology, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Jiraporn RuangsittichaiDepartment of Medical Entomology, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Ronald Enrique Morales VargasDepartment of Medical Entomology, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Liwang CuiDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, USA.
Jetsumon SattabongkotMahidol Vivax Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Jean-Pierre DujardinIRD, UMR INTERTRYP IRD, CIRAD, University of Montpellier, F-34398, Montpellier, France.
Suchada SumruaypholDepartment of Medical Entomology, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. Electronic address: suchada.sum@mahidol.ac.th.

Funding

Southeast Asia Malaria Research CenterU19AI089672 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI CUI, LIWANG · 2010 to 2023
$28.9M
Vivax Malaria culture technique and genetic diversity in ThailandD43TW006571 · FIC · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY-UNIV PARK · PI CUI, LIWANG · 2004 to 2018
$1.9M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW006571NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI089672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Members of the Maculatus group are important malaria vectors in the border regions of Thailand. However, the role of each species in malaria transmission remains unclear because of their highly similar morphologies, making them difficult to be differentiated. Whereas An. pseudowillmori may be identified by the color pattern of some scales on abdomen and wings, the distinction between An. maculatus and An. sawadwongporni relies on the wings only. Scales are labile structures, as they may be accidentally removed during capture and transportation to the laboratory. To discriminate among the species of this group, we tested the suitability of geometric techniques. Shape variables were used as input for discriminant analyses and validated reclassification. Both landmark- and outline-based geometric techniques disclosed significant differences between the three species. For the delicate An. maculatus - An. sawadwongporni distinction, the outline-based approach appeared as the most promising, with validated reclassification scores reaching 93%, as compared to 77% obtained by landmark data. For An. pseudowillmori, reclassification scores were 100% and 94%, respectively. Geometric morphometrics may provide an alternative and useful complement for discriminating members of the Maculatus group.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnophelesMosquito VectorsThailandAnopheles maculatusAnopheles pseudowillmoriAnopheles sawadwongporniGeometric morphometricsSpecies identification

Identifiers

PMID30710534
PMCPMC7110943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.