ArticleJournal of medical radiation sciences2019
Employing positive psychology to improve radiation therapy workplace culture.
Article in Journal of medical radiation sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring staff recruitment and retention in radiation therapy: global insights from an ESTRO RTT workshop.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Continuing Professional Development-Medical Imaging.Journal of medical radiation sciences · 2025Article
- Integration of art and technology in personalized radiation oncology care: Experiences, evidence, and perspectives.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- A radiotherapy staff experience of gratitude during COVID-19 pandemic.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2021Article
- Employing positive psychology to improve radiation therapy workplace culture.Journal of medical radiation sciences · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedCorrigendum.2019
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Australian radiotherapy profession is challenged by job dissatisfaction, stress, burnout and unfavourable attrition. This paper will use psychological models to discuss the confluence of job demands, resources and personal characteristics that contribute to these challenges. Factors contributing to burnout and attrition amongst Australian Radiation Therapists will be explored, and a number of leadership strategies will be introduced to improve workplace culture. These strategies - aligned with positive psychology - seek to address staff engagement, emotional needs, and job stressors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.