Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30710339›Full record

SynthesisDevelopmental medicine and child neurology2019

Oral melatonin for non-respiratory sleep disturbance in children with neurodisabilities: systematic review and meta-analyses.

Adwoa Parker, Bryony Beresford, Vicki Dawson, Heather Elphick, Caroline Fairhurst, Catherine Hewitt, Arabella Scantlebury, Gemma Spiers, Megan Thomas, Kath Wright and 1 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Developmental medicine and child neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Efficacy of Liposomal Melatonin in sleep EEG in Childhood: A Double Blind Case Control Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Common Issues for General Practitioners in the Medical Management of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Care.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Adwoa ParkerYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2880-3935
Bryony BeresfordSocial Policy Research Unit, University of York, York, UK.
Vicki DawsonThe Children's Sleep Charity, Doncaster, UK.
Heather ElphickSheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Caroline FairhurstYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Catherine HewittYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Arabella ScantleburyYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3518-2740
Gemma SpiersInstitute for Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Megan ThomasBlackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Blackpool, UK.
Kath WrightCentre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK.
Catriona McdaidYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.

Funding

Department of Health HS&DR/13/01/17Department of Health HS&DR/13/10/86Department of Health HTA/14/212/02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo evaluate the effectiveness of pharmacological interventions for managing non-respiratory sleep disturbances in children with neurodisabilities.

methodWe performed a systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We searched 16 databases, grey literature, and reference lists of included papers up to February 2017. Data were extracted and assessed for quality by two researchers (B.B., C.M., G.S., A.S., A.P.).

resultsThirteen trials were included, all evaluating oral melatonin. All except one were at high or unclear risk of bias. There was a statistically significant increase in diary-reported total sleep time for melatonin compared with placebo (pooled mean difference 29.6min, 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.9-52.4, p=0.01). Statistical heterogeneity was high (97%). For the single RCT with low risk of bias, the unadjusted mean difference in total sleep time was 13.2 minutes (95% CI -13.3 to 39.7) favouring melatonin, while the mean difference adjusted for baseline total sleep time was statistically significant (22.4min, 95% CI 0.5-44.3, p=0.04). Adverse event profile suggested that melatonin was well-tolerated.

interpretationThere is a paucity of evidence on managing sleep disturbances in children with neurodisabilities, and it is mostly of limited scope and poor quality. There is evidence of the benefit and safety of melatonin compared with placebo, although the extent of this benefit is unclear. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: Melatonin for the management of non-respiratory sleep disturbances in children with neurodisabilities was well tolerated with minimal adverse effects. The extent of benefit and which children might benefit most from melatonin use is uncertain. Benefit may be greatest in those with autism spectrum disorder; however, this finding should be interpreted with caution.

Indexed as

ActigraphyAutism Spectrum DisorderChildHumansMelatoninSleep Wake DisordersTreatment OutcomeMelatonin

Identifiers

PMID30710339
PMCPMC6617775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.