Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30710203›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neuro-oncology2019

Targeted next-generation sequencing panel (TruSight Tumor 170) in diffuse glioma: a single institutional experience of 135 cases.

Kiyong Na, Hyun-Soo Kim, Hyo Sup Shim, Jong Hee Chang, Seok-Gu Kang, Se Hoon Kim

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Signaling pathways in brain tumors and therapeutic interventions.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kiyong NaDepartment of Pathology, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hyun-Soo KimDepartment of Pathology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hyo Sup ShimDepartment of Pathology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jong Hee ChangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seok-Gu KangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Se Hoon KimDepartment of Pathology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea. paxco@yuhs.ac.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7516-7372

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea 2016M3C7A1913844
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe TruSight Tumor 170 (TST-170) panel consists of a DNA workflow for the identification of single-nucleotide variants, small insertions and deletions, and copy number variation, as well as a panel of 55 genes for a RNA workflow for the identification of splice variants and gene fusions. To date, the application of TST-170 in diffuse gliomas (DGs) has not been described.

methodsWe analyzed 135 samples of DG, which were diagnosed by WHO criteria based on histological features and conventional molecular tests including immunostaining, 1p/19q FISH, and analysis of MGMT methylation and TERT promoter mutation.

resultsA total of 135 cases consisted of 38 IDH-mutant [17 astrocytoma (AC), 13 oligodendroglioma (OD) and eight glioblastoma (GBM)], 87 IDH-wildtype (six AC, three OD and 78 GBM), and 10 diffuse midline glioma, H3K27M-mutant. DNA analysis enabled the detection of all mutations identified in these samples by conventional techniques, and the results were highly comparable to the known mutations in each subtype. RNA analysis detected four fusion genes including PTPRZ1-MET, FGFR3-TACC3, FAM131B-BRAF, and RET-CCDC6 and one splicing variant (EGFR vIII mutant). Clustered copy number loss in 1p and 19q loci genes were detected in 1p/19q-codeleted OD.

conclusionsThe application of TST-170 panel based NGS in clinical and laboratory setting is expected to improve diagnostic accuracy and prognostication. Most benefits are expected in IDH-wildtype DG, a group of genetically heterogenous tumors harboring DNA sequence changes, copy number alterations, and fusions in a large number of oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes.

Indexed as

DNA Copy Number VariationsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorBrain NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGliomaHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMaleMiddle AgedMutationBiomarkers, TumorIsocitrate DehydrogenaseGliomaMolecular profilesNext-generation sequencingTST-170

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.