ArticleThe journal of primary prevention2019
Three Critical Elements for Real-Time Monitoring of Implementation and Adaptation of Prevention Programs.
Article in The journal of primary prevention, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Value Equation: Three complementary propositions for reconciling fidelity and adaptation in evidence-based practice implementation.BMC health services research · 2019Article
- Commentary on Scaling-Up Evidence-Based Interventions in Public Systems.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
We are at a place in history where the prevention science literature has established a cadre of evidence-based programs and practices (EBPPs) that have been proven, under controlled efficacy and effectiveness trials, to significantly improve the well-being of those served. Research in implementation science has also repeatedly demonstrated the importance of fidelity for realizing the benefits of these EBPPs when applied in real-world contexts. However, as a field, while we have ever-increasing evidence of 'what' systems and supports are needed to take EBPPs to scale, we continue to struggle with 'how' to successfully bring them to scale with quality in real-world service settings. The articles in this special issue of The Journal of Primary Prevention (JPP) further our understanding of the dimensions that need to be considered when scaling EBPPs and help inform what a scalable implementation support system would entail. The following commentary discusses implications for such a system and presents an example of using technology to support scaling up EBPPs while maintaining program fidelity and quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.