Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30710112›Full record

ArticleEye (London, England)2019

Ophthalmology specialist trainee survey in the United Kingdom.

William H Dean, Susannah Grant, Jim McHugh, Oliver Bowes, Fiona Spencer

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Eye (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. The Israeli eye care system through a public and global health lens.Israel journal of health policy research · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

William H DeanInternational Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene and Topical Medicine, London, UK. will.dean@lshtm.ac.uk.
Susannah GrantThe Royal College of Ophthalmologists, London, UK.
Jim McHughDepartment of Neuro-Ophthalmology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, University College London Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK.
Oliver BowesDepartment of Ophthalmology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Fiona SpencerThe Royal College of Ophthalmologists, London, UK.
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBManchester University NHS Foundation Trust · GBRoyal College of Ophthalmologists · GBRoyal London Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrently there are a total of 780 post-graduate ophthalmology trainees in the United Kingdom (UK). Post-graduate ophthalmology training in the UK is 7 years in duration, and follows a comprehensive competency-based curriculum. Changes to training have been proposed as part of the government's Shape of Training paper.

methodsUK ophthalmic trainees and trainers, in partnership with the Royal College of Ophthalmologists, designed a national questionnaire to explore the confidence of trainees in different clinical and non-clinical aspects of ophthalmology. The questions and possible responses underwent a process of refinement through the Royal College of Ophthalmologists Training Committee and Trainee Group. An online survey platform was used for the questionnaire, which was sent to all ophthalmology trainees within the UK. Reminders were sent via the Royal College of Ophthalmologists and Regional Training Programme Directors. A 4-week period was allowed for responses. Quantitative data were analysed, and qualitative data analysis included collation and thematisation of free-text responses.

resultsA total of 188 trainees (24.1% response rate) replied. Ninety-four percent of trainees were in full-time training posts. The most popular career choice was oculoplastics (31.4%), followed by vitreo-retina (25.1%), glaucoma (24.6%) and cornea (24.0%). One-quarter had opted out of the European working time directive (EWTD), and 54.8% agreed that their work contract reflected the number of hours actually worked. In total, 34.4% of trainees thought that ophthalmic specialist training should be shortened from the current 7-year programme. Overall, 79.9% of respondents felt confident in performing phacoemulsification cataract surgery independently. For more senior trainees in years 4-7, 100% felt confident in phacoemulsification. However, overall, only 47.9% were confident in independently performing an anterior vitrectomy (91.1% of final-year trainees). Overall, 77.6% thought that all surgical ophthalmologists should be trained to perform cataract surgery. For non-clinical skills, trainees felt least confident in 'preparing a business case', with 64.5% disagreeing that they felt confident in this task. The most confidence was felt for communication with patients: 100% of trainees (all of whom have completed at least 2 years of medical work following qualification) reported feeling confident.

conclusionsMost doctors in post-graduate specialist training in ophthalmology in the UK aim to specialise in surgical sub-specialities. The subjective reports collected in this survey suggest targets for strengthening of the UK's highly rated training system. Further research is necessary to determine overall satisfaction with training, the effect of changing training within the recent Shape of Training review; and how recent newly imposed junior doctor contracts as well as Brexit affects training.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceCurriculumEducation, Medical, GraduateFaculty, MedicalFemaleHumansMaleOphthalmologySurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID30710112
PMCPMC6707274
OpenAlexW2914198330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.