Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30710096›Full record

ArticleHeredity2019

Landscape genetic analyses of Cervus elaphus and Sus scrofa: comparative study and analytical developments.

Simon Dellicour, Jérôme G Prunier, Sylvain Piry, Marie-Christine Eloy, Sabine Bertouille, Alain Licoppe, Alain C Frantz, Marie-Christine Flamand

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heredity, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Simon DellicourSpatial Epidemiology Lab (SpELL), Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium. simon.dellicour@ulb.ac.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9558-1052
Jérôme G PrunierStation d'Ecologie Théorique et Expérimentale (UMR 5321), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Université Paul Sabatier (UPS), 2 route du CNRS, Moulis, 09200, France.
Sylvain PiryCBGP, INRA, CIRAD, IRD, Montpellier SupAgro, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Marie-Christine EloyInstitut des Sciences de la Vie, University of Louvain, Croix du Sud, 4-15, Bte7.07.14, Louvain-la-Neuve, B-1348, Belgium.
Sabine BertouilleDépartement de l'Etude du Milieu Naturel et Agricole, Service Public de Wallonie, Avenue Marechal Juin 23, Gembloux, B-5030, Belgium.
Alain LicoppeDépartement de l'Etude du Milieu Naturel et Agricole, Service Public de Wallonie, Avenue Marechal Juin 23, Gembloux, B-5030, Belgium.
Alain C FrantzMusée National d'Histoire Naturelle, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Marie-Christine FlamandInstitut des Sciences de la Vie, University of Louvain, Croix du Sud, 4-15, Bte7.07.14, Louvain-la-Neuve, B-1348, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Red deer and wild boar are two major game species whose populations are managed and live in areas impacted by human activities. Measuring and understanding the impact of landscape features on individual movements and spatial patterns of genetic variability in these species is thus of importance for managers. A large number of individuals sampled across Wallonia (Belgium) for both species have been genotyped using microsatellite markers (respectively > 1700 and > 1200 genotyped individuals) and some individuals have also been followed using a capture-mark-recapture (CMR) protocol. The combined data set represents an unprecedented opportunity to study and compare the environmental factors impacting the interconnectivity of these large mammals. The present study describes and uses a landscape genetic workflow to compare spatial patterns of genetic variability and the impact of environmental factors on genetic differentiation. For the latter analyses, we investigate the correlation between genetic and environmental distances (pairwise approach) and also between local genetic dissimilarity and environmental conditions (point approach). Preliminary analyses of CMR data confirm that motorways act as significant barriers to dispersal. However, analyses performed with the pairwise approach do not highlight any evidence of an impact of motorways on genetic differentiation, which is presumably due to their recent establishment. Complementary analyses performed with the point approach reveal that low altitude tends to be associated with higher genetic dissimilarity. From a methodological point of view, the present workflow illustrates the complementary application of both pairwise and point approaches, as well as univariate and multivariate analyses.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, WildBelgiumDeerGenotypeHumansMicrosatellite RepeatsSus scrofaSwine

Identifiers

PMID30710096
PMCPMC6781151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.