Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30710080›Full record

ReviewNature communications2019

Continuous dynamic adjustment of the plant circadian oscillator.

Alex A R Webb, Motohide Seki, Akiko Satake, Camila Caldana

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. A Compensated Clock: Temperature and Nutritional Compensation Mechanisms Across Circadian Systems.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alex A R WebbDepartment of Plant Sciences, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB3 0LJ, UK. aarw2@cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0261-4375
Motohide SekiFaculty of Design, Kyushu University, 4-9-1 Shiobaru, Minamiku, Fukuoka, 815-8540, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2042-1158
Akiko SatakeDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, 819-0395, Japan.
Camila CaldanaMax Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, Am Mühlenberg 1, 14476, Potsdam-Golm, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The clockwork of plant circadian oscillators has been resolved through investigations in Arabidopsis thaliana. The circadian oscillator is an important regulator of much of plant physiology, though many of the mechanisms are unclear. New findings demonstrate that the oscillator adjusts phase and period in response to abiotic and biotic signals, providing insight in to how the plant circadian oscillator integrates with the biology of the cell and entrains to light, dark and temperature cycles. We propose that the plant circadian oscillator is dynamically plastic, in constant adjustment, rather than being an isolated clock impervious to cellular events.

Indexed as

Circadian ClocksAdaptation, PhysiologicalArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsCarbonHomeostasisArabidopsis ProteinsCarbon

Identifiers

PMID30710080
PMCPMC6358598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.