Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30709709›Full record

ArticleMolecular cell2019

R-Loops Enhance Polycomb Repression at a Subset of Developmental Regulator Genes.

Konstantina Skourti-Stathaki, Elena Torlai Triglia, Marie Warburton, Philipp Voigt, Adrian Bird, Ana Pombo

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular cell, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 118 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Science advances · 2024
    Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Konstantina Skourti-StathakiWellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology, University of Edinburgh, EH9 3BF Edinburgh, UK; Berlin Institute for Medical Systems Biology, Max Delbrueck Centre for Molecular Medicine, Berlin-Buch 13092, Germany. Electronic address: kskourti@staffmail.ed.ac.uk.
Elena Torlai TrigliaBerlin Institute for Medical Systems Biology, Max Delbrueck Centre for Molecular Medicine, Berlin-Buch 13092, Germany.
Marie WarburtonWellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology, University of Edinburgh, EH9 3BF Edinburgh, UK.
Philipp VoigtWellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology, University of Edinburgh, EH9 3BF Edinburgh, UK.
Adrian BirdWellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology, University of Edinburgh, EH9 3BF Edinburgh, UK.
Ana PomboBerlin Institute for Medical Systems Biology, Max Delbrueck Centre for Molecular Medicine, Berlin-Buch 13092, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany; Institute for Biology, Humboldt-Universitat zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany. Electronic address: ana.pombo@mdc-berlin.de.
Max Delbrück Center · DEUniversity of Edinburgh · GBWellcome Centre for Cell Biology · GB

Funding

European Research Council 639253Medical Research Council G0800401Wellcome Trust 104175Wellcome Trust 107930/Z/15/ZWellcome Trust 203149
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

R-loops are three-stranded nucleic acid structures that form during transcription, especially over unmethylated CpG-rich promoters of active genes. In mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs), CpG-rich developmental regulator genes are repressed by the Polycomb complexes PRC1 and PRC2. Here, we show that R-loops form at a subset of Polycomb target genes, and we investigate their contribution to Polycomb repression. At R-loop-positive genes, R-loop removal leads to decreased PRC1 and PRC2 recruitment and Pol II activation into a productive elongation state, accompanied by gene derepression at nascent and processed transcript levels. Stable removal of PRC2 derepresses R-loop-negative genes, as expected, but does not affect R-loops, PRC1 recruitment, or transcriptional repression of R-loop-positive genes. Our results highlight that Polycomb repression does not occur via one mechanism but consists of different layers of repression, some of which are gene specific. We uncover that one such mechanism is mediated by an interplay between R-loops and RING1B recruitment.

Indexed as

CpG IslandsGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalPromoter Regions, GeneticTranscription, GeneticAnimalsBinding SitesCell LineDown-RegulationEnhancer of Zeste Homolog 2 ProteinMiceMouse Embryonic Stem CellsNucleic Acid ConformationPolycomb Repressive Complex 1Protein BindingRNA Polymerase IIStructure-Activity RelationshipEnhancer of Zeste Homolog 2 ProteinEzh2 protein, mousePolycomb Repressive Complex 1RNA Polymerase IIRnf2 protein, mouseUbiquitin-Protein Ligasesgene regulationpoisingPolycomb proteinsRING1BR loopsRNA polymerase II

Identifiers

PMID30709709
PMCPMC6414425
OpenAlexW2912269007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.