Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30709406›Full record

ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2019

Loneliness among adults with visual impairment: prevalence, associated factors, and relationship to life satisfaction.

Audun Brunes, Marianne B Hansen, Trond Heir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The first step in developing an International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Core Set for Vision Loss: A systematic review.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. The development of posttraumatic stress disorder in individuals with visual impairment: a systematic search and review.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2021
    Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Loneliness and Mental Wellbeing in People With Inherited Macular Disease.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Development of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Core Set for Vision Loss: Insights From the Lived Experience of People With Vision Loss.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Carers' recognition of concurrent visual impairment in dementia.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2025
    Article
  20. Review

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Audun BrunesSection for Trauma, Catastrophes and Forced Migration - Adults and Elderly, Norwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies, PB 181 Nydalen, Oslo, Norway. audun.brunes@nkvts.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0806-5963
Marianne B HansenNorwegian National Unit for Hearing Impairment and Mental Health, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, PB 1039 Blindern, Oslo, Norway.
Trond HeirSection for Trauma, Catastrophes and Forced Migration - Adults and Elderly, Norwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies, PB 181 Nydalen, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

European Commission, Directorate - General Humanitarian Aid and Civil Protection ECHO/SUB/2015/718665/PREP17Norges Blindeforbund not applicable
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLittle is known about whether and to what extent loneliness impacts the lives of people with visual impairment (VI). Thus, the aim of this study was to examine the prevalence of and factors associated with loneliness in adults with VI, and to examine its association with life satisfaction.

methodsThis cross-sectional interview study included a probability sample of 736 adults (≥18 years old) with VI who were members of the Norwegian Association of the Blind and Partially Sighted. The interviews took place from January to May 2017, collecting information about sociodemographics, VI characteristics, adverse life events, loneliness (Three Item Loneliness Scale), and life satisfaction (Cantril's Ladder of Life Satisfaction). The prevalence of loneliness was compared to data obtained from the general Norwegian population (N = 14,884; mean age 46.4 years; 50.7% females).

resultsThe prevalence of moderate and severe loneliness in the VI population was 28.7% (95% CI: 25.4, 32.1) and 19.7% (95% CI: 16.9, 22.8), respectively. The rates were consistently higher across age groups compared to the general population. Loneliness was associated with younger age, blindness, having other impairments, unemployment, and a history of bullying or abuse. In addition, higher scores on loneliness were associated with lower levels of life satisfaction (fully adjusted β = - 0.48, 95% CI: - 0.55, - 0.41).

conclusionsLoneliness is common in adults with VI. Strategies capable of reducing loneliness could improve life satisfaction among people who are blind or visually impaired.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAge FactorsBlindnessCase-Control StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLonelinessMaleMiddle AgedNorwayPersonal SatisfactionPersons with Visual DisabilitiesQuality of LifeVision, LowBlindnessLife satisfactionLonelinessVisual impairment

Identifiers

PMID30709406
PMCPMC6359849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.