Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30709333›Full record

ArticleThe journal of headache and pain2019

Effects of onabotulinumtoxinA treatment in chronic migraine patients with and without daily headache at baseline: results from the COMPEL Study.

William B Young, J Ivan Lopez, John F Rothrock, Amelia Orejudos, Aubrey Manack Adams, Richard B Lipton, Andrew M Blumenfeld

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of headache and pain, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Observational
  10. Approach to Pediatric Intractable Migraine.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

William B YoungJefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, 900 Walnut Street, Second Floor, Suite #200, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA. William.b.young@jefferson.edu.
J Ivan LopezUniversity of South Alabama College of Medicine, Mobile, AL, USA.
John F RothrockGeorge Washington School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
Amelia OrejudosAllergan plc, Irvine, CA, USA.
Aubrey Manack AdamsAllergan plc, Irvine, CA, USA.
Richard B LiptonMontefiore Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Andrew M BlumenfeldHeadache Center of Southern California, The Neurology Center, Carlsbad, CA, USA.

Funding

Allergan plc NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOnabotulinumtoxinA is effective in preventing chronic migraine (CM); however, the benefit of onabotulinumtoxinA in patients with CM with daily headache is unknown because these patients are typically excluded from clinical trials. This subanalysis of the COMPEL Study assessed the efficacy and safety of onabotulinumtoxinA in people with CM with and without daily headache.

methodsIn total, 715 patients received onabotulinumtoxinA 155 U with or without concomitant oral preventive treatment. Patients who had complete daily diary records for the 28 days of the baseline period were stratified based on daily headache status. The primary outcome variable was reduction in headache-day frequency per 28-day period at 108 weeks (after 9 treatment cycles) relative to baseline. Exploratory outcomes included moderate to severe headache days, migraine disability (using the Migraine Disability Assessment [MIDAS] questionnaire), and health-related quality of life (Migraine-Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire v2 [MSQ]). Adverse events and their relatedness were recorded.

resultsOverall, 641 patients had complete daily diary records at baseline. In patients with daily headache (n = 138) versus without (n = 503), treatment with onabotulinumtoxinA was associated with a significant mean (SD) reduction in 28-day headache-day frequency relative to baseline at week 108 (- 10.5 [9.2] vs - 12.2 [6.7], respectively; both P < 0.001) with no significant between-group difference (P = 0.132). The mean (SD) reduction in moderate to severe headache days at week 108 was significant in patients with and without daily headache (- 11.5 [9.4] and - 9.9 [6.4]; P < 0.001) with no significant between-group difference (P = 0.153). Mean (SD) MIDAS scores significantly improved from baseline at week 108 (- 43.3 [73.4] and - 43.6 [46.7]; both P < 0.001), with no significant between-group difference (P = 0.962). Similarly, mean (SD) MSQ subscale scores significantly improved from baseline at week 108 for patients with and without daily headache. OnabotulinumtoxinA was well tolerated in patients with and without daily headache.

conclusionResults indicate that onabotulinumtoxinA is associated with reductions from baseline in headache-day frequency and improvements in disability and quality of life for up to 108 weeks in people with CM with daily headache; however, a longer duration of treatment was required to fully realize the treatment effect on headache. No new safety concerns were identified.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdultAgedBotulinum Toxins, Type AChronic DiseaseDisability EvaluationFemaleHeadacheHumansMaleMiddle AgedMigraine DisordersNeuromuscular AgentsProspective StudiesQuality of LifeBotulinum Toxins, Type ANeuromuscular Agentsonabotulinum toxin ACOMPELDaily headacheDisabilityMigraineOnabotulinumtoxinAQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID30709333
PMCPMC6734507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.