Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30708270›Full record

ArticleEarly human development2019

Predicting text reading skills at age 8 years in children born preterm and at term.

Lauren R Borchers, Lisa Bruckert, Katherine E Travis, Cory K Dodson, Irene M Loe, Virginia A Marchman, Heidi M Feldman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Early human development, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Social-environmental moderators of neurodevelopmental outcomes in youth born preterm: A systematic review.Child neuropsychology : a journal on normal and abnormal development in childhood and adolescence · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Early medical risks to language development in extremely preterm infants.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lauren R BorchersDivision of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1265 Welch Road, Postal Code 5415, Stanford, CA 94305, United States of America. Electronic address: lrborchers@stanford.edu.
Lisa BruckertDivision of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1265 Welch Road, Postal Code 5415, Stanford, CA 94305, United States of America. Electronic address: bruckert@stanford.edu.
Katherine E TravisDivision of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1265 Welch Road, Postal Code 5415, Stanford, CA 94305, United States of America. Electronic address: ktravis1@stanford.edu.
Cory K DodsonDivision of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1265 Welch Road, Postal Code 5415, Stanford, CA 94305, United States of America.
Irene M LoeDivision of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1265 Welch Road, Postal Code 5415, Stanford, CA 94305, United States of America. Electronic address: iloe@stanford.edu.
Virginia A MarchmanDepartment of Psychology, Building 460 Margaret Jacks Hall, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, United States of America. Electronic address: marchman@stanford.edu.
Heidi M FeldmanDivision of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1265 Welch Road, Postal Code 5415, Stanford, CA 94305, United States of America. Electronic address: hfeldman@stanford.edu.
Stanford Medicine · USStanford University · US

Funding

Poor Reading in Preterms: Neural Basis, Prediction, & Response to InterventionR01HD069162 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI FELDMAN, HEIDI M. · 2012 to 2016
$1.8M
Listening to Mom in the NICU: Neural, Clinical and Language OutcomesR00HD084749 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI TRAVIS, KATHERINE ELIZABETH · 2019 to 2021
$724k
Executive Function in Preschoolers: Characteristics and Response to TreatmentK23HD071971 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LOE, IRENE M · 2013 to 2017
$699k
Listening to Mom in the NICU: Neural, Clinical and Language OutcomesK99HD084749 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI TRAVIS, KATHERINE ELIZABETH · 2016 to 2017
$255k
NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD071971NICHD NIH HHS K99 HD084749NICHD NIH HHS R00 HD084749NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD069162
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChildren born preterm are at risk for developing reading difficulties and for decrements in other cognitive skills compared to children born at term.

aimsTo assess how domains of function, often negatively impacted by preterm birth, predict reading development in children born preterm and at term. STUDY

designLongitudinal descriptive cohort study. SUBJECTS: Preterm (n = 48; gestational age 22-32 weeks, 30 males) and term (n = 41, 18 males) participants were assessed at age 6 years on a battery of verbal and non-verbal cognitive skills and reassessed at age 8 using the Gray Oral Reading Tests-5. Linear regressions assessed the contributions of phonological awareness, language, executive function, and non-verbal IQ at age 6 to reading outcome at age 8.

resultsChildren born preterm had lower scores than children born at term on all measures (Cohen's d from 0.46 to 1.08, all p < .05). Phonological awareness and language abilities predicted reading in both groups (accounting for 19.9% and 25.0% of variance, respectively, p < .001). Birth group did not moderate the association. By contrast, the association between executive function and non-verbal intelligence and reading outcome was moderated by birth group (interaction accounted for 3.9-6.7% of variance, respectively, p < .05). Positive predictions to reading from executive function and non-verbal IQ were found only in children born preterm.

conclusionsNon-verbal cognitive skills improved the prediction of reading outcome only in the preterm group, suggesting that reading decrements represent a component of global deficits. These findings have implications for evaluation of children born preterm at school entry and treatment of reading difficulties.

Indexed as

ReadingChildExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansInfant, Extremely PrematureInfant, NewbornLanguage DevelopmentMaleCognitionExecutive functionLanguagePhonological awarenessPredictionPrematurityReading development

Identifiers

PMID30708270
PMCPMC6402954
OpenAlexW2911605479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.