ArticleJournal of microbiological methods2019
A multiplexed, indirect enzyme-linked immunoassay for the detection and differentiation of E. coli from other Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa from other glucose non-fermenters.
Article in Journal of microbiological methods, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Test Strips Based on Gated Nanoporous Anodic Alumina for the Rapid and Accurate Detection ofAnalytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Optical Methods for Label-Free Detection of Bacteria.Biosensors · 2022Review
- Establishment and evaluation of an indirect ELISA for detection of antibodies to goat Klebsiella pneumonia.BMC veterinary research · 2021Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) are important causes of community (CA) and hospital (HA)- associated infections. Here we describe the development of an indirect ELISA (I-ELISA), which can be used to detect and differentiate the Enterobacteriaceae Escherichia coli, and glucose non-fermenter Pseudomonas aeruginosa from other GNB species. The I-ELISA utilizes six antibodies for bacterial speciation, which were grouped according to their bacterial targets; Enterobacteriaceae (SL-EntA and CH1810 mAb), Escherichia coli (SL-EcA and 6103-46 mAb), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (SL-PaA and SL-PaB). The six, anti-GNB antibodies were first screened against a panel of well-characterized clinical GNB isolates to optimize assay conditions and to determine individual antibody sensitivity and specificity. When tested against a diverse, blinded panel of 94 GNB clinical isolates, the I-ELISA exhibited the following sensitivity/specificity for each target: Enterobacteriaceae (94.4%/95%), E. coli (82.6%/88.7%), P. aeruginosa (83.3%/96%). An I-ELISA to detect and differentiate the most common GNB pathogens offers advantage in terms of simplicity over diagnostic tests currently used in most clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.