Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30707731›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Private and social time preference for health outcomes: A general population survey in Iran.

Alireza Mahboub-Ahari, Abolghasem Pourreza, Ali Akbari Sari, Trevor A Sheldon, Maryam Moeeni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Domain-specific discounting of health and money: implications for health technology assessment.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Interim value set for the EQ-5D-5L in Iran using the Crosswalk method.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alireza Mahboub-AhariDepartment of Health Economics, and Health Management Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-9170-2950
Abolghasem PourrezaDepartment of Health Management and Economics, and Knowledge Utilization Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ali Akbari SariDepartment of Health Management and Economics, and Knowledge Utilization Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Trevor A SheldonDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, United Kingdom.
Maryam MoeeniHealth Management and Economics Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-4525-6574

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the recent increase in economic evaluations of health care programs in low and middle income countries, there is still a surprising gap in evidence on the appropriate discount rate and the discounting of health outcomes such as quality adjusted life years (QALYs). Our study aimed to calculate the implied time preference rate for health outcomes in Iran and its key determinants. Data were gathered from one family member from each of the 650 households randomly selected in Tehran. The respondents' private and social preferences for health outcomes were calculated using the time trade-off (TTO) technique based on the discounted utility model. We investigated the main assumptions of the discounted utility model through equality of mean comparison, and the association between private time preference and key socio-economic determinants using multilevel regression analysis. The mean and median implied rates were 5.8% and 4.9% for private time preference and 25.6% and 20% for social time preference respectively. Our study confirmed that magnitude, framing and time effects have a significant impact on implied discount rates, which means that the conventional discounted utility model's main assumptions are violated in the Iranian general population. Other models of discounting which apply lower rates for far health outcomes might provide a more sensible solution to discounting health interventions with long-term impacts.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHealth PrioritiesHumansInterviews as TopicIranMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesTime FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30707731
PMCPMC6358076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.