Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30707418›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology reports2019

Optimization of Agrobacterium-mediated transformation in spring bread wheat using mature and immature embryos.

Rakesh Kumar, Harohalli Masthigowda Mamrutha, Amandeep Kaur, Karnam Venkatesh, Davinder Sharma, Gyanendra Pratap Singh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The functions of TaLAD1-A1, Rht8, and Rht-D1b in regulating leaf angle in wheat.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Functional Analysis of Naturally IntegratedPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rakesh KumarICAR-Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research (IIWBR), Karnal, Haryana, 132001, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0811-5657
Harohalli Masthigowda MamruthaICAR-Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research (IIWBR), Karnal, Haryana, 132001, India. mamruthamadhu@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0242-5654
Amandeep KaurICAR-Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research (IIWBR), Karnal, Haryana, 132001, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4935-1699
Karnam VenkateshICAR-Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research (IIWBR), Karnal, Haryana, 132001, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8765-8451
Davinder SharmaICAR-Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research (IIWBR), Karnal, Haryana, 132001, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4438-4507
Gyanendra Pratap SinghICAR-Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research (IIWBR), Karnal, Haryana, 132001, India.
Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research · INNational Bureau of Animal Genetic Resources · IN

Funding

Indian Council of Agricultural Research 1006474
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wheat is the most widely grown staple food crop in the world and accounts for dietary needs of more than 35% of the human population. Current status of transgenic wheat development is slow all over the world due to the lack of a suitable transformation system. In the present study, an efficient and reproducible Agrobacterium-mediated transformation system in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is established. The mature and immature embryos of six recently released high yielding spring bread wheat genotypes were used to standardize various parameters using Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA105 harbouring binary vector pCAMBIA3301 having gus and bar as marker genes. The optimum duration for embryo pre-culture, inoculation time and co-cultivation were 2 days, 30 min and 48 h, respectively. The bacterial inoculum concentration of OD of 1 at 600 nm showed 67.25% transient GUS expression in the histochemical GUS assay. The filter paper based co-cultivation limits the Agrobacterium overgrowth and had 82.3% explants survival rate whereas medium based strategy had 22.7% explants survival only. The medium having picloram 4 mg/l along with antibiotics (cefotaxime 500 mg/l and timentin 300 mg/l) was found best suitable for initial week callus induction. The standardized procedure gave overall 14.9% transformation efficiency in immature embryos and 9.8% in mature embryos and confirmed by gene-specific and promoter-specific PCR and southern analysis. These results indicate that the developed Agrobacterium-mediated transformation system is suitable for diverse wheat genotypes. The major obstacle for the implication of the CRISPR-based genome editing techniques is the non-availability of a suitable transformation system. Thus, the present system can be exploited to deliver the T-DNA into the wheat genome for CRISPR-based target modifications and transgene insertions.

Indexed as

AgricultureAgrobacteriumAgrobacterium tumefaciensDNA, BacterialGenetic EngineeringGenetic MarkersPlants, Genetically ModifiedPoaceaePromoter Regions, GeneticSeedsTransformation, GeneticTransgenesTriticumDNA, BacterialGenetic MarkersT-DNAbar geneHistochemical GUS assaySouthern analysisTransformationWheat, Triticum aestivum, cereal, Agrobacterium

Identifiers

PMID30707418
OpenAlexW2914160403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.