ArticleEuropean journal of nutrition2020
Adequacy of iron intakes and socio-demographic factors associated with iron intakes of Australian pre-schoolers.
Article in European journal of nutrition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Methodology insights and population characteristics of the Nutri-Bébé 2022 study: study design, sample description, and data collection.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Bioavailability of Australian pre-schooler iron intakes at specific eating occasions is low.European journal of nutrition · 2024Article
- Review
- Dietary Approaches to Iron Deficiency Prevention in Childhood-A Critical Public Health Issue.Nutrients · 2022Review
- Addressing nutrient shortfalls in 1- to 5-year-old Irish children using diet modeling: development of a protocol for use in country-specific population health.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2022Article
- Dietary patterns of Australian pre-schoolers and associations with haem and non-haem iron intakes.European journal of nutrition · 2021Article
- Association Between Caregiver's Perception of "Good" Dietary Habits and Food Group Intake Among Preschool Children in Tokyo, Japan.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo estimate the prevalence of inadequate iron intakes and identify socio-demographic factors associated with iron intakes of Australian children aged 2-5 years.
methodsData from the 2011-2012 National Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey component of the Australian Health Survey were analysed (n = 783, 2-5 years old). Dietary intake was assessed via two non-consecutive 24-h recalls. Prevalence of inadequate iron intake was estimated using the full probability approach after estimating the distribution of usual intakes with PC-SIDE. Associations between potential socio-demographic factors and energy-adjusted iron intakes were assessed via linear regression accounting for the complex survey design.
resultsMean (SD) iron intakes for pre-schoolers were 7.9 (1.9) mg/day and the prevalence of inadequate iron intake was 10.1% (95% CI 7.9%, 12.1%). Male sex (mean difference between boys and girls: - 0.22 (95% CI - 0.03, - 0.41) mg/day; p = 0.022) and age (each additional year was associated with 0.11 (95% CI - 0.22, - 0.00) mg/day lower iron intake; p = 0.048) were negatively associated with pre-schooler iron intakes.
conclusionsThis study provides current data relating to the iron nutrition of Australian pre-schoolers. Poor iron intakes continue to be a problem for 10% of Australian children beyond the second year of life, with iron intakes being lower for boys compared to girls and declining with age. Future research should examine strategies to improve iron intakes of young children, with a focus on promoting iron-rich food sources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.