ReviewDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2019
[Current and experimental treatment approaches for neurotrophic keratopathy].
Review in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Amniotic membrane transplantation for neurotrophic corneal ulcers.Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia · 2024Article
- Incidence, prevalence, and outcome of moderate to severe neurotrophic keratopathy in a German tertiary referral center from 2013 to 2017.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
neurotrophic keratopathyNeurotrophic keratopathy (NK) is a rare corneal disease caused by an impaired corneal innervation. It leads to spontaneous recurrent epithelial defects potentially leading to corneal ulcers and perforation. To avoid severe corneal damage, a prompt and stage-adjusted treatment is necessary. Treatment of NK is challenging. Due to the lack of direct causal treatment options, only a supportive therapy was previously possible. ESTABLISHED TREATMENT: The basic treatment of NK consists of intensive ocular surface lubrication with artificial tears free from preservatives. Medication toxic to the epithelium must be discontinued and associated ocular surface diseases must be treated in the best possible way. In advanced stages surgical options, such as amniotic membrane transplantation, tarsorrhaphy and conjunctival flaps are used but autologous serum can also be used to achieve closure of the epithelium. NOVEL AND EXPERIMENTAL TREATMENT OPTIONS: Cenegermin, a recombinant neurotrophic growth factor, has recently become available, which can be used for the causal treatment of advanced stages of NK. Clinical experience with this drug is, however, still limited. Corneal neurotization is an established procedure in other medical disciplines and is currently also being evaluated in the treatment of NK. Keratoplasty is only used in emergencies, such as corneal perforation, as it is associated with a high risk for recurrent neurotrophic corneal ulcers. The various techniques of keratoplasty and the absolutely necessary concomitant treatment are also discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.